Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Oct 30;311:267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.008

Table 1:

Significance in terms of p-values for each combination of dataset and analysis method measured using a 2-sample t-test run on the subject loadings of the GDM as well as Hotelling’s T2-test. Note that the trends of the significance of each combination of dataset and analysis method is consistent across the two tests.

AOD (ICA) AOD (IVA) SIRP (ICA) SIRP (IVA) SM (ICA) SM (IVA)
GDM 1.65 × 10−13 3.74 × 10−12 4.54 × 10−7 4.20 × 10−8 7.52 × 10−16 4.53 × 10−9
T2-test 8.19 × 10−10 2.48 × 10−9 3.95 × 10−5 3.06 × 10−6 1.15 × 10−14 1.00 × 10−6