Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0208070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208070

Table 5. Relationship between pole force variables with change in walking distance and speed, METs, energy cost of walking, and amount of %EMGmax.

Peak pole force Pole contact time % pole contact time Pole impulse
Changes in walking
distance and speed
r = 0.67, P < 0.01 r = 0.05, P = 0.86 r = 0.08, P = 0.76 r = 0.63, P = 0.01
Changes in
METs
r = 0.66, P < 0.01 r = 0.38, P = 0.13 r = 0.47, P = 0.06 r = 0.56, P = 0.02
Changes in energy
cost of walking
r = 0.41, P = 0.10 r = 0.43, P = 0.09 r = 0.51, P = 0.04 r = 0.32, P = 0.21
Changes in the sum of upper limb %EMGmax r = -0.21, P = 0.41 r = -0.42, P = 0.10 r = -0.41, P = 0.10 r = -0.31, P = 0.23
Changes in the sum of lower limb %EMGmax r = 0.22, P = 0.40 r = 0.18, P = 50 r = 0.39, P = 0.12 r = 0.25, P = 0.33
Changes in the sum of whole body %EMGmax r = 0.23, P = 0.28 r = 0.18, P = 0.50 r = 0.40, P = 0.12 r = 0.25, P = 0.33