Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;9:1704. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01704

Table 3.

Stomata index of C. paliurus leaves under different LED light treatments (Means ± SD).

Treatment Stomatal length (μm) Stomatal width (μm) Single stomatal pore area (μm2) No. of stomata (m m-2) Total stomatal pore area index (SPI) (μm2/m2)
WL 24.5 ± 0.38b 19.9 ± 0.17b 52.8 ± 1.64b 124.0 ± 9.54a 6559.8 ± 707.74a
BL 29.1 ± 0.36a 24.2 ± 1.07a 74.1 ± 1.52a 90.1 ± 4.86b 6668.9 ± 377.06a
GL 24.7 ± 0.71b 17.2 ± 0.69c 14.3 ± 1.56d 66.7 ± 3.18c 960.1 ± 146.11c
RL 28.9 ± 0.29a 18.1 ± 0.85c 48.8 ± 0.36c 71.0 ± 6.62c 3468.8 ± 346.75b

Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between LED light treatments according to ANOVA and LSD test, n = 3. LED lamps used: WL, white light; BL, blue light; GL, green light; RL, red light.