Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 24;38(11):1911–1923. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17719790

Table 3.

Deviance analysis of prediction models for different endpoints.

Model AIC Deviance d.f. p
Early neurologic improvement
 W/LSA-term 100.16 88.157 80
 W/o LSA-term 110.03 100.03 81 0.0005708
Discharge mRS≤2
 W/p LSA-term 89.457 77.457 76
 W/o LSA-term 10.044 90.438 77 0.0003147
Day 90 mRS≤2
 W/LSA-term 73.13 61.313 66
 W/o LSA-term 83.529 73.529 67 0.0004739

Note: The Akaike information criterion and deviance is displayed stratified according to two distinct predictions models, one including the variable LSA-sign+ vs. LSA-sign (LSA-term) and one without the LSA term. Both models included age, admission NIHSS, reperfusion grade, final infarct volume and time to treatment. Data are displayed for three different clinical endpoints (early neurologic improvement, defined as difference between admission and discharge NIHSS ≥8 or discharge NIHSS ≤ 1, modified Rankin scale at discharge ≤2 and modified Ranking scale at day 90 ≤ 2). The p value refers to the comparison of deviance between the model including the LSA-term and the model excluding the LSA-term.

mRS: modified Rankin scale, W/: with; w/o: without; AIC: Akaike information criterion; d.f.: degrees of freedom.