Table 1.

Summary of Experimentally Determined Diffusion Parameters for ERES and ER Junctions at Room Temperature and at 37°C, without and with Nocodazole Treatment

		RTa (−)b	RT (+)c	37°C (−)	37°C (+)
ERES	$\langle \alpha \rangle$	0.64	0.56	0.62	0.57
	$\langle K_{\alpha }\times 1{\text{s}}^{\alpha }\rangle$[× 10−3μm2]	5.50	3.16	7.30	4.37
	$\langle A\rangle$	0.43	0.40	0.42	0.39
	n	4005	3272	3004	3984
ERJd	$\langle \alpha \rangle$	0.51	0.35	0.53	0.33
	$\langle K_{\alpha }\times 1{\text{s}}^{\alpha }\rangle$[× 10−3μm2]	3.47	3.39	4.79	5.37
	$\langle A\rangle$	0.35	0.27	0.35	0.30
	n	1900	2291	1075	388

α and K_α denote the diffusion anomaly and the generalized diffusion coefficient, respectively; A and n refer to the asphericity and the number of evaluated trajectories. Data for ER junctions were taken from (26); insignificant changes with respect to the previously stated numerical values are due to a re-evaluation with fixed trajectory length N = 300. Standard errors of the mean were smaller than ±0.01 in all cases. Parameter value changes induced by nocodazole treatment and differences in parameter values between ERES and ER junctions at the same conditions were significant to the 1% level (Kolmogorov-Smirnov as well as Student’s t-test).

^aRT, room temperature.

^b−, without nocodazole treatment.

^c+, with nocodazole treatment.

^dERJ, ER junction.