Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;14:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.003

Table 2.

Volumetric analysis and interobserver variation in CT and FDG-PET/CT based GTV delineations of six oesophageal cancer patients for 20 observers.

Case Mean volume in cm3
Generalized Conformity Index (CIgen)
Cranial delineation variation 1SD (cm)
Caudal delineation variation 1SD (cm)
Central overall SD (RMS, cm)
CT FDG-PET/CT p* CT FDG-PET/CT CT FDG-PET/CT p** CT FDG-PET/CT p** CT FDG-PET/CT
1 51.0 53.1 0.362 0.67 0.69 1.5 1.3 0.597 0.9 0.4 0.002 0.17 0.17
2 54.2 49.2 0.001 0.76 0.77 0.3 0.4 0.295 1.0 0.5 0.005 0.17 0.15
3 65.8 76.7 0.002 0.66 0.69 1.1 0.4 <0.001 0.7 0.8 0.526 0.12 0.13
4 52.0 45.0 0.005 0.62 0.65 1.0 0.9 0.594 0.8 0.7 0.671 0.25 0.25
5 28.3 26.8 0.402 0.58 0.56 1.1 1.0 0.792 0.6 0.8 0.165 0.10 0.09
6 13.3 12.4 0.020 0.75 0.76 0.3 0.3 0.556 0.2 0.2 0.978 0.11 0.10

Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; FDG-PET = fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; SD = standard deviation; CIgen = generalized conformity index (sum of the common divided by the sum of the encompassing volumes between each pair of observers). Cranial/caudal delineation variation = SD in the position of the most cranial/caudal delineated slice over the observers. Central overall SD = quadratic mean of the local SD weighted for surface (RMS = Root Mean Square) of the central part of the median surface where 100% of the observers agreed to delineate.

*

p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, one-sample T-test (2-tailed).

**

p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, 2-sided F-test.