Table 5.
GLS linear regression: malaria microscopy blood slide staining and reading observation scores
| Unadjusted | Model 2 (adjusted)a | |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage point change (95% CI) | Percentage point change (95% CI) | |
| Covariates | ||
| RDT observation score | 0.5 [0.4, 0.7]*** | |
| Malaria blood slide preparation observation score | 0.6 [0.5, 0.7]*** | 0.4 [0.3, 0.5]*** |
| All SOPs for malaria microscopy are present | ||
| Yes | Reference | |
| No | − 5.5 [− 12.8, 1.8] | |
| All bench aids for malaria microscopy are present | ||
| Yes | Reference | |
| No | − 0.6 [− 7.5, 6.3] | |
| Conducts malaria species identification | ||
| Yes | 6.5 [1.2, 11.9]* | 3.7 [− 1.8, 9.2] |
| No | Reference | Reference |
| Uses parasites/µL for parasite quantitation | ||
| Yes | 7.2 [2.6, 11.8]** | − 0.4 [− 6.1, 5.3] |
| No | Reference | Reference |
| Uses “plus system” for parasite quantitation | ||
| Yes | − 13.3 [− 17.3, − 9.4]*** | − 7.2 [− 12.2, − 2.1]** |
| No | Reference | Reference |
| Uses microscopy positive controls | ||
| Yes | 7.4 [2.4, 12.3]** | 3.7 [− 0.9, 8.3] |
| No | Reference | Reference |
| Stores stained microscopy slides for cross-checking | ||
| Yes | 4.5 [0.2, 8.8]* | 2.0 [-2.7, 6.6] |
| No | Reference | Reference |
| Stock-outs of malaria microscopy consumables | ||
| Yes | − 3.2 [− 7.3, 0.9] | |
| No | Reference | |
| Stock-outs of RDTs | ||
| Yes | − 3.6 [− 9.5, 2.3] | |
| No | Reference | |
| Periodicity of OTSS assessments | ||
| All assessments occurred within a 1 year period | 12.3 [4.9, 19.7]** | 8.7 [2.7, 14.7]** |
| All assessments occurred in > 1 year period | Reference | Reference |
| Number of OTSS visits | ||
| 1 | Reference | Reference |
| 2 | 1.2 [− 3.7, 6.1] | − 3.1 [− 9.4, 3.2] |
| 3 | 5.6 [0.7, 10.4]* | − 2.7 [− 8.7, 3.4] |
| 4 | 11.0 [6.1, 15.8]*** | − 0.2 [− 6.5, 6.1] |
Statistically significant results are in italics
CI confidence interval, SOP standard operating procedure
Model 2: Wald X2 = 96.8 (p < 0.0001); 183 observations
*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05
aAn ex-ante pairwise correlation test was run to detect multicollinearity; covariates indicating problematic correlation (≥ 0.55) were not included in the fully adjusted model