Skip to main content
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases logoLink to Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
. 2018 Nov 26;13:211. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0955-7

A nomenclature and classification for the congenital myasthenic syndromes: preparing for FAIR data in the genomic era

Rachel Thompson 1,, Angela Abicht 2, David Beeson 3, Andrew G Engel 4, Bruno Eymard 5, Emmanuel Maxime 6, Hanns Lochmüller 7,8,9
PMCID: PMC6260762  PMID: 30477555

Abstract

Background

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a heterogeneous group of inherited neuromuscular disorders sharing the common feature of fatigable weakness due to defective neuromuscular transmission. Despite rapidly increasing knowledge about the genetic origins, specific features and potential treatments for the known CMS entities, the lack of standardized classification at the most granular level has hindered the implementation of computer-based systems for knowledge capture and reuse. Where individual clinical or genetic entities do not exist in disease coding systems, they are often invisible in clinical records and inadequately annotated in information systems, and features that apply to one disease but not another cannot be adequately differentiated.

Results

We created a detailed classification of all CMS disease entities suitable for use in clinical and genetic databases and decision support systems. To avoid conflict with existing coding systems as well as with expert-defined group-level classifications, we developed a collaboration with the Orphanet nomenclature for rare diseases, creating a clinically understandable name for each entity and placing it within a logical hierarchy that paves the way towards computer-aided clinical systems and improved knowledge bases for CMS that can adequately differentiate between types and ascribe relevant expert knowledge to each.

Conclusions

We suggest that data science approaches can be used effectively in the clinical domain in a way that does not disrupt preexisting expert classification and that enhances the utility of existing coding systems. Our classification provides a comprehensive view of the individual CMS entities in a manner that supports differential diagnosis and understanding of the range and heterogeneity of the disease but that also enables robust computational coding and hierarchy for machine-readability. It can be extended as required in the light of future scientific advances, but already provides the starting point for the creation of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) knowledge bases of data on the congenital myasthenic syndromes.

Keywords: Congenital myasthenic syndromes, CMS, Neuromuscular junction, Neuromuscular disease, Nomenclature, Ontology, Nosology, Coding, Classification, Rare disease

Background

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are rare inherited neuromuscular disorders characterized by fatigable weakness of skeletal muscle owing to compromised function of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). First described in the 1940s [1] as a potential rare “familial” form of infantile myasthenia contrasting with the more common autoimmune-mediated myasthenia gravis, the first genetic defects associated with the condition were reported in the 1990s [2]. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the number of genetic defects reported as causative of a CMS phenotype has increased dramatically, with as many as 31 genes now implicated [3]. The known types of CMS range in frequency from more than 1000 individuals to single sporadic reported cases, and around 20 to 40% of cases remain without a genetic diagnosis after exome sequencing [3]. Although all CMS share the common features of NMJ pathology and fatigable weakness, the severity of the disease, its course of progression, specific phenotypic manifestations and even effective treatments are highly variable between the different types. Furthermore, different pathogenic changes within the same gene may result in different pathological processes and therefore markedly different disease manifestations and therapeutic options [4].

Within this complex environment, it is clear not only that precision in diagnosis is important in order to correctly define the disease and institute appropriate treatment, but that precision in coding or classification of this diagnosis is a prerequisite for any attempt at systematizing knowledge and linking it to a specific CMS type. Yet coding and classification has long been a vexed issue in the rare disease field as a whole, going far beyond CMS [5]. Where clinical or genetic entities do not have a named entry in disease coding systems, they are often invisible in clinical records and inadequately annotated in information systems, since features that apply to one disease but not another cannot be adequately differentiated [6].

Coinciding with the dramatic increase in genomic data and computational approaches to diagnosis, recent years have seen the emergence of new data science approaches and their application to clinical problems to allow the systematization of existing and newly generated clinical knowledge in a way that is more accessible to computational analysis. This has been termed the FAIR data approach, an acronym that stands for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable and represents the concept that the utility of clinical and research data is dramatically increased if it can be made accessible to reuse by others [7]. Precision in nomenclature terms is just one aspect of making a dataset FAIR, but nevertheless a crucial one in order to attach the right knowledge to the right disease. Our present study aimed to create a comprehensive classification for all CMS disease entities as a starting point that will then allow generation of FAIR-compliant datasets of knowledge about each type.

Methods

We began by defining the CMS disease entities to be considered in the classification. We adopted a broad definition of CMS as any genetic neuromuscular condition manifesting with fatigable weakness of skeletal muscle and apparent NMJ involvement. We defined individual CMS “unique entities” at (a) gene level in cases where the presumed pathomechanism is identical for defects anywhere in a given gene, or (b) sub-gene level in cases where different defects in different regions of the same gene result in different disease manifestations due to differing pathomechanisms (e.g. to differentiate slow-channel from fast-channel syndromes within the same acetylcholine receptor gene). We did not split the classification to account for variable severity, age of onset or incomplete penetrance of phenotypic features where the underlying pathomechanism is the same, and we excluded non-CMS presentations of disorders caused by defects in the same genes that may also cause CMS presentation (e.g. kidney presentations of LAMB2 defects). In the case of genetic entities affecting ubiquitous metabolic pathways (glycosylation defects, mitochondrial defects), some specific mutations cause a primary neuromuscular transmission defect, and these are included in our classification, while other mutations cause wider organ involvement, where the neuromuscular transmission defect may become irrelevant or not detectable (e.g. syndromic congenital disorders of glycosylation, encephalomyopathy), and these are then classified elsewhere.

The entities thus defined therefore aim to be those that from a data science perspective are sufficiently granular to allow the mapping of disease to feature and extend the range of knowledge about that specific disease entity. Based on this framework, through a literature review we developed a comprehensive listing of all unique CMS clinical and genetic entities described to date that met our criteria for inclusion. We captured the range of terminology used in the literature to describe or name each entity or group of entities. Using their publicly available online browsers, we then reviewed the most widely used medical and genetic coding systems to establish their coverage of these published CMS disease entities. Table 1 provides details of the coding systems analyzed, the browsers used and the summary results of the search.

Table 1.

Coverage of congenital myasthenic syndromes by the major medical coding systems

Coding system Terminology browser used Coding for congenital myasthenic syndromes class/category Coding for individual CMS types
International Classification of Disease (ICD) Revision 11 https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en 8C61: Congenital myasthenic syndromes No coding but textual description of four categories:
Congenital myasthenic syndrome with presynaptic defect, Synaptic basal lamina-associated CMS, Congenital myasthenia with postsynaptic defect, CMS with glycosylation deficiency, Unidentified CMS.
International Classification of Disease (ICD) Revision 10 http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en G70.2: Congenital and developmental myasthenia Not present
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/search C16.320.590: Myasthenic Syndromes, Congenital Not present
Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) http://browser.ihtsdotools.org/ 230672006: Congenital myasthenia (disorder) Not present
Orphanet nomenclature of rare diseases https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/Disease.php?lng=EN ORPHA:590: Congenital myasthenic syndrome Most granular level is absent. Subclasses are defined:
Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes
Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes
Synaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes
Congenital myasthenic syndromes with glycosylation defect
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) http://omim.org/ N/A Coding of 28 out of 39 entities with “phenotype MIM number” (for detail see Table 2)
No hierarchies/ontological features

From the results of the initial stage of the research, we concluded that all existing coding systems had major gaps in coverage, in most cases caused by inadequate levels of granularity, with the most granular entities either completely or partially absent. Given the pressing need to define a fully granular classification for the “data science” purposes described above, we initiated a collaboration with Orphanet to extend the Orphanet nomenclature [8] to include our unique CMS disease entities. We aimed to avoid creation of a competing classification given the multiplicity of systems already in existence, and Orphanet was selected as the most suitable system for this collaboration because it aims to be a fully comprehensive coding system specifically designed for rare disease; it makes use of a hierarchical system or tree-like structure in which disease entities can be grouped in different logical ways; it includes mappings to many other coding systems at appropriate levels of granularity thus ensuring interoperability [9]; and it welcomes collaborations with domain experts for the purposes of extending its nomenclature. Orphanet has published a procedural document [10] for rare disease nomenclature in English that provides detailed guidance for naming entities, which states that names should be based on clinical practice, validated by experts in the field, comprehensive, consistent, and as stable as possible with regard to evolution of scientific knowledge. We therefore defined “descriptive names” for each entity in a manner consistent with the Orphanet guidelines, creating a clinically understandable name for each entity that should be stable notwithstanding the rapid advances in understanding the genetics of CMS. It is important to note that while the descriptive names are valuable from the perspective of human understanding, the essential point is that the disease entities are assigned unique identifiers within the coding system, which enables computer-readability and interoperability with other systems.

At the initial stage, the full listing of unique clinical entities that are classed as a CMS according to our definition is a non-hierarchical nosology or “flat” table (Table 2) mapped to the existing coding systems as appropriate. However, since Orphanet allows the creation of a hierarchical classification in which individual disorders may be grouped into one or multiple parent groups based on specific features, we also created an additional table in which we grouped all the unique entities from Table 2 based on etiological or other features (Table 3).

Table 2.

Nomenclature proposals for individual CMS disease entities and mapping to pre-existing classifications

Gene involved Proposed descriptive name OMIM phenotype number and name Treatment options [4, 11] Existing Orphanet name (group level) Names in literature (group level) Names in literature (entity level)
AGRN Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to agrin deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in AGRN 615120: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 8; CMS8
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, with pre- and postsynaptic defects; CMSPPD
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, due to agrin deficiency
Salbutamol or ephedrine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes AND ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Defects in endplate development and maintenance • Agrin deficiency
ALG14 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in ALG14 616227: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 15; CMS15
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, without tubular aggregates; CMSWTA
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine ORPHA:353327 Congenital myasthenic syndromes with glycosylation defect • Limb-girdle-myasthenia with glycosylation deficiency
• CMS due to abnormal glycosylation
• Congenital defects of glycosylation
• Defects in protein glycosylation
• ALG14 myasthenia
ALG2 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in ALG2 616228: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 14; CMS14
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, with tubular aggregates 3; CMSTA3
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine ORPHA:353327 Congenital myasthenic syndromes with glycosylation defect • Limb-girdle-myasthenia with glycosylation deficiency
• CMS due to abnormal glycosylation
• Congenital defects of glycosylation
• Defects in protein glycosylation
• ALG2 myasthenia
CHAT Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to endplate choline acetyltransferase deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHAT 254210: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 6, presynaptic; CMS6
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, presynaptic, congenital, associated with episodic apnea; CMSEA
Congenital myasthenic syndrome type Ia2, CMS1a2, CMS Ia2,
Myasthenia, familial infantile, FIM,
Myasthenia gravis, familial infantile, 2, FIMG2,
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • CMS with episodic apnea
• Synthesis and Recycling of Acetylcholine
• Endplate choline acetyltransferase deficiency
• CMS with episodic apnea
CHRNA1 Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNA1 601462: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 1a, slow-channel; CMS1a
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, type IIA, CMS2a, CMS 2a
Fluoxetine or quinidine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Slow-channel syndrome, SCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRNA1 Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNA1 608930: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 1b, fast-channel; CMS1b
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 1b, fast-channel; CMS1b
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of salbutamol / ephedrine or 3,4-diaminopyridine. Avoid β2-adrenergic agonists (fluoxetine / quinidine) ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Fast-channel syndrome, FCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRNA1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNA1 N/A Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine N/A • Primary AChR deficiency
CHRNB1 Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNB1 616313: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 2a, slow-channel; CMS2a Fluoxetine or quinidine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Slow-channel syndrome, SCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRNB1 Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNB1 N/A Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of salbutamol / ephedrine or 3,4-diaminopyridine. Avoid β2-adrenergic agonists (fluoxetine / quinidine) N/A • Fast-channel syndrome, FCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRNB1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNB1 616314: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 2c, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiency; CMS2c Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Primary AChR deficiency
CHRND Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRND 616321: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 3a, slow-channel; CMS3a Fluoxetine or quinidine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Slow-channel syndrome, SCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRND Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by pathogenic variants in CHRND 616322: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 3b, fast-channel; CMS3b Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of salbutamol / ephedrine or 3,4-diaminopyridine. Avoid β2-adrenergic agonists (fluoxetine / quinidine) ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Fast-channel syndrome, FCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRND Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRND 616323: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 3c, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiency; CMS3c Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Primary AChR deficiency
CHRND Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in acetylcholine receptor clustering caused by pathogenic variants in CHRND N/A Pyridostigmine N/A
CHRNE Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNE 605809: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 4a, slow-channel; CMS4a
Alternative/former titles:
Congenital myasthenic syndrome type Ia1, CMS1a1, CMS Ia1
Fluoxetine or quinidine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Slow-channel syndrome, SCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRNE Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNE 616324: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 4b, fast-channel; CMS4b Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of salbutamol / ephedrine or 3,4-diaminopyridine. Avoid β2-adrenergic agonists (fluoxetine / quinidine) ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Fast-channel syndrome, FCS
• Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
CHRNE Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNE 608931: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 4c, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiency; CMS4c
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, type ID; CMS1D, CMS ID, Myasthenia, familial infantile, 1, FIM1,
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Primary AChR deficiency
CHRNE Congenital myasthenic syndrome with kinetic defect due to reduced ion channel conductance caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNE N/A Pyridostigmine N/A • Kinetic abnormalities of the AChR
• Reduced ion channel conductance
COL13A1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to collagen 13 defects caused by pathogenic variants in COL13A1 616720: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 19; CMS19 Salbutamol / ephedrine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine. Pyridostigmine likely ineffective. ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Synaptic and basal-lamina associated syndromes
• Synaptic space
COLQ Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to endplate acetylcholinesterase deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in COLQ 603034: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 5; CMS5
Alternative/former titles:
Endplate acetylcholinesterase deficiency; EAD
Engel congenital myasthenic syndrome
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, Engel type
Congenital myasthenic syndrome type IC, CMS1c, CMS IC
Salbutamol or ephedrine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98915 Synaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Synaptic and basal-lamina associated syndromes
• Synaptic space
• Endplate AChE deficiency
• Endplate acetylcholinesterase deficiency
DOK7 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in docking protein 7 caused by pathogenic variants in DOK7 254300: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 10; CMS10
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenia, limb-girdle, familial, LGM,
Congenital myasthenic syndrome type Ib, CMS1b, CMS Ib, Myasthenic myopathy
Salbutamol or ephedrine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Defects within the AChR-clustering pathway
• Defects in endplate development and maintenance
• DOK7-associated limb-girdle-myasthenia
• DOK7 CMS
• Dok-7 myasthenia
DPAGT1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in DPAGT1 614750: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 13; CMS13
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, with tubular aggregates 2; CMSta2
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine N/A • Limb-girdle-myasthenia with glycosylation deficiency
• CMS due to abnormal glycosylation
• Congenital defects of glycosylation
• Defects in protein glycosylation
• DPAGT1 myasthenia
GFPT1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in GFPT1 610542: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 12; CMS12
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, with tubular aggregates 1; CMSTA1
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine N/A • Limb-girdle-myasthenia with glycosylation deficiency
• CMS due to abnormal glycosylation
• Congenital defects of glycosylation
• Defects in protein glycosylation
• GFPT1 myasthenia
GMPPB Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in GMPPB N/A
(615352 is for the LGMD phenotype minus the myasthenic features)
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine N/A • Limb-girdle-myasthenia with glycosylation deficiency
• CMS due to abnormal glycosylation
• Congenital defects of glycosylation
• Defects in protein glycosylation
• GMPPB myasthenia
LAMB2 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to laminin beta 2 deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in LAMB2 N/A Salbutamol or ephedrine ORPHA:98915 Synaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Synaptic basal lamina-associated syndromes • Laminin beta2 deficiency
LRP4 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 caused by pathogenic variants in LRP4 616304: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 17; CMS17 Salbutamol or ephedrine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Defects within the AChR-clustering pathway
• Defects in endplate development and maintenance
• LRP4 myasthenia
MUSK Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in MuSK caused by pathogenic variants in MUSK 616,325: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 9, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiency; CMS9 Salbutamol or ephedrine as first line; avoid pyridostigmine / acetylcholinesterase inhibitors ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Defects within the AChR-clustering pathway
• Defects in endplate development and maintenance
• Congenital MuSK myasthenia
• MuSK deficiency
MYO9A Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect in Myosin 9A caused by pathogenic variants in MYO9A N/A Pyridostigmine ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Axonal transport
• Presynaptic
• Myosin 9a deficiency
PLEC1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to plectin deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in PLEC1 N/A Pyridostigmine N/A • Other myasthenic syndromes • Plectin deficiency
PREPL Congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in PREPL that predict reduced filling of synaptic vesicles with ACh 616224: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 22; CMS22
Alternative/former titles:
PREPL deficiency
Pyridostigmine N/A • Limb-girdle-myasthenia with glycosylation deficiency
• Synthesis and Recycling of Acetylcholine
• Other myasthenic syndromes
• PREPL deletion syndrome
• PREPL deficiency
RAPSN Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to endplate rapsyn deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in RAPSN 616326: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 11, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiency; CMS11
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, Ie, CMS1e, CMS Ie
Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine or salbutamol / ephedrine ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Defects within the AChR-clustering pathway
• Defects in endplate development and maintenance
• Endplate rapsyn deficiency
• Rapsyn deficiency
• Rapsyn CMS
SCN4A Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a sodium channel 1.4 defect caused by pathogenic variants in SCN4A 614198: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 16; CMS16
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, acetazolamide-responsive
Pyridostigmine as first line; acetazolamide may be helpful for periodic paralysis ORPHA:98913 Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Other myasthenic syndromes • Na channel myasthenia
• Sodium channel myasthenia
SLC18A3 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a vesicular acetylcholine transporter defect caused by pathogenic variants in SLC18A3 617239: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 21, presynaptic; CMS21 Pyridostigmine ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Synthesis and recycling of acetylcholine • Vesicular ACh transporter deficiency
SLC25A1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a mitochondrial citrate carrier defect caused by pathogenic variants in SLC25A1 N/A Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of 3,4-diaminopyridine ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Other syndromes • Mitochondrial citrate carrier deficiency
SLC5A7 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a choline transporter defect caused by pathogenic variants in SLC5A7 617143: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 20, presynaptic; CMS20 Pyridostigmine as first line; may benefit from addition of salbutamol / ephedrine ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Synthesis and recycling of acetylcholine • High-affinity presynaptic choline transporter
SNAP25B Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a synaptosomal-associated protein 25 defect caused by pathogenic variants in SNAP25B 616330: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 18; CMS18
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 18, with intellectual disability and ataxia
3,4-diaminopyridine N/A • Synaptic vesicles exocytosis
• Presynaptic
• SNAP25-associated CMS
• SNAP25B CMS
• SNAP25B deficiency
SYT2 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a synaptotagmin defect caused by a pathogenic variant in SYT2 616040: Myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 7, presynaptic; CMS7
Alternative/former titles:
Myasthenic syndrome, presynaptic, congenital, with or without motor neuropathy; MYSPC
3,4-diaminopyridine ORPHA:98914 Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes • Synaptic vesicles exocytosis
• Presynaptic
• SYT2 CMS
• Synaptotagmin 2 myasthenia
UNC13A Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a mammalian uncoordinated-13 protein defect caused by a pathogenic variant in UNC13A N/A 3,4-diaminopyridine as first line; may benefit from addition of pyridostigmine N/A • Synaptic vesicles exocytosis
• Presynaptic
• Munc13–1 myasthenia
VAMP1 Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a vesicle associated membrane protein 1 defect caused by a pathogenic variant in VAMP1 N/A Pyridostigmine N/A • Synaptic vesicles exocytosis
• Presynaptic
• Synaptobrevin-1 myasthenia

Table 3.

Proposed revision of Orphanet hierarchy below ORPHA:590 (Congenital myasthenic syndrome)

ORPHA number Typology Root Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
ORPHA:590 Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndrome
ORPHA:98913 Group of phenomes Postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes with kinetic defect
NEW Group of phenomes Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndromes
NEW Disease Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNA1
NEW Disease Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNB1
NEW Disease Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRND
NEW Disease Fast-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNE
NEW Group of phenomes Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndromes
NEW Disease Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNA1
NEW Disease Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNB1
NEW Disease Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRND
NEW Disease Slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome due to an acetylcholine receptor defect caused by a pathogenic variant in CHRNE
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes with kinetic defect due to reduced ion channel conductance
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome with kinetic defect due to reduced ion channel conductance caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNE
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes with primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNA1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNB1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRND
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHRNE
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to primary or secondary defects in acetylcholine receptor clustering
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in acetylcholine receptor clustering caused by pathogenic variants in CHRND
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to endplate rapsyn deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in RAPSN
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to defects in endplate development and maintenance
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to agrin deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in AGRN
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 caused by pathogenic variants in LRP4
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in muscle-specific kinase caused by pathogenic variants in MUSK
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to defects in docking protein 7 caused by pathogenic variants in DOK7
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to plectin deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in PLEC1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a sodium channel 1.4 defect caused by pathogenic variants in SCN4A
ORPHA:98914 Group of phenomes Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to defective axonal transport
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect in Myosin 9A caused by pathogenic variants in MYO9A
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to defective synthesis or recycling of acetylcholine
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to endplate choline acetyltransferase deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in CHAT
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in PREPL that predict reduced filling of synaptic vesicles with ACh
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a choline transporter defect caused by pathogenic variants in SLC5A7
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a vesicular acetylcholine transporter defect caused by pathogenic variants in SLC18A3
NEW Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to defective synaptic vesicles exocytosis
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a synaptosomal-associated protein 25 defect caused by pathogenic variants in SNAP25B
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a synaptotagmin defect caused by a pathogenic variant in SYT2
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a mammalian uncoordinated-13 protein defect caused by a pathogenic variant in UNC13A
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a vesicle associated membrane protein 1 defect caused by a pathogenic variant in VAMP1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a mitochondrial citrate carrier defect caused by pathogenic variants in SLC25A1
ORPHA:98915 Group of phenomes Synaptic and basal lamina associated congenital myasthenic syndromesa
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to endplate acetylcholinesterase deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in COLQ
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to collagen 13 defects caused by pathogenic variants in COL13A1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to laminin beta 2 deficiency caused by pathogenic variants in LAMB2
ORPHA:353327 Group of phenomes Congenital myasthenic syndromes with glycosylation defect
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in GFPT1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in DPAGT1
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in ALG2
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in ALG14
NEW Disease Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a defect of glycosylation caused by pathogenic variants in GMPPB

aname of group updated from “synaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes”

Results

We defined a total of 39 unique clinical/genetic CMS entities and provided descriptive names for each (Table 2). These were mapped to existing OMIM and Orphanet classifications and existing expert-defined descriptive terms for each were captured from the literature to aid in the definition of group-level classification. Treatment options were obtained from the literature [4, 11] and outlined in Table 2. We then placed the defined entities within the Orphanet classification and hierarchy below the pre-existing entry for congenital myasthenic syndrome, modifying one existing class name and adding 10 group-level phenotypic classes at various levels of the hierarchy and 39 unique disease entities (Table 3).

Discussion

CMS is classed within the European Union as a rare disease (defined as one that affects fewer than 1 in 2000 individuals) and many of the individual CMS entities are ultra-rare. This has substantial implications for knowledge management, since while much highly expert knowledge on CMS does exist, in common with many other rare diseases this knowledge is often “siloed” in individual research or clinical databases in a few expert centers [12]. Academic publishing still largely relies on “non-machine-readable” formats such as PDF and this again provides a barrier to easy access and reuse [13]. This means that not only do fewer clinicians who encounter CMS patients have the relevant experience themselves, but it is also more challenging and time-consuming for them to locate the information they need.

Clinical, genetic and scientific experts in CMS have come together periodically to review and update classifications of the disease at workshops hosted by the European Neuromuscular Centre [1416], in NCBI’s GeneReviews series [17] and several comprehensive recent review publications [3, 4, 18]. Broad classifications of CMS into presynaptic, synaptic and postsynaptic CMS and CMS with glycosylation defect were originally proposed in 2001 [15], but it is only with the very latest update to the International Classification of Disease (ICD), Revision 11 [19], that these subgroups even receive a mention (without, however, being allocated a classification number). Meanwhile, as the number and variety of CMS disease entities published in the literature has increased, expert-proposed groupings have been extended to include a new group containing defects of endplate development and maintenance [18]. However, the expert reviews have not attempted any standardization of nomenclature in the coding systems, and at the most granular level, individual “atomic” disease entities or subtypes are conspicuous in their absence from all the coding systems except the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database [20]. OMIM itself has good (although not entirely comprehensive) coverage of the individual disease entities, each represented by a “phenotype MIM number” and a sequentially numbered name, and is recognized as the authoritative reference for genetic disorders, but is not itself a nosology or ontology but rather a catalogue, which is thus complementary to (and mappable to) the classification we create here.

To counter the problem of lack of representation of rare disease entities in knowledge systems, bringing data science approaches into the clinical domain has been the focus of a number of recent activities at the European and international level, including the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) [21], the European Open Science Cloud [22], Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) [23], the Monarch Initiative [24], GO-FAIR [25], RD-Connect [26] and the new European Joint Programme for Rare Disease to be launched in 2019. Making use of ontologies and coding systems when capturing clinical information and diagnoses is a key step in preparing data for reanalysis and machine-readability [27], but in order for this to be of benefit, the coding system must be fit for purpose – which means it must contain the relevant items in the correct relative positions and at appropriate levels of granularity. If this is not the case, data cannot be appropriately connected or connections may produce misleading results. For example, to a clinician familiar with CMS, it goes without saying that the connection between “congenital myasthenic syndrome” and “responsive to pyridostigmine” is true for CMS caused by RAPSN defects and false for that caused by defects in DOK7, but a database that only contains an entry for “congenital myasthenic syndrome” has no way of making that distinction. The result of this is that the specific knowledge that is so familiar to the disease experts cannot easily gain wider currency by being made part of online databases or clinical decision support systems, and furthermore the evidence gathered in a clinical setting in support of particular interventions or particular phenotypic associations cannot be fed back into wider practice by from medical or prescribing records, for example.

Of course, no classification in such a rapidly evolving and heterogeneous field can ever be completely comprehensive, and there are always areas where different decisions could be made, such as about the level of granularity or the range of conditions to include. Our inclusion criteria were based primarily on clinical and phenotypic presentation together with some pathomechanistic insights, while a purely gene-based approach might have produced a classification not exclusively including CMS presentations but also kidney or skin disease presentations caused by different defects in the same genes. In addition, there are other neuromuscular conditions that do have detectable morphological and functional disturbances of the neuromuscular junction, but where these are considered to be secondary to the primary pathology or of minor clinical relevance as compared to the primary clinical manifestation (e.g. spinal muscular atrophy or myotubular myopathy). These conditions are classified in different systems and do not appear in our CMS classification. However, from a data science perspective, the choice of what to include or exclude can indeed be left to expert opinion and is of secondary importance compared to the depth and detail of what is covered, and crucially, its internal logic and relationships with other entities and other classification systems [27]. The CMS entities that we have defined fit perfectly as subclasses within the broader coding systems like ICD and SNOMED-CT and map at a 1:1 level to the phenotype MIM numbers where these exist (see Table 2). They can be grouped into preexisting etiological groups such as pre- and post-synaptic (Table 3), and are amenable to multiple other functional, phenotypic and therapeutic groupings as appropriate (“responsive to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors”, “with limb-girdle phenotype”, “associated with episodic apnea” or “characterized by tubular aggregates”, for example).

To take full advantage of the classification developed here, it will be necessary that these next steps are taken, since the development of classification systems, even with names that aim to have some clinical relevance, is of limited diagnostic or therapeutic value in itself. Rather, it should be thought of as the essential foundation onto which more precise clinical and diagnostic pictures of each disease entity can be built, and it is this systematization of knowledge that can then be brought back into the diagnostic and clinical arena to result in improved diagnostic algorithms and clinical information systems. One future development well supported by Orphanet that is a logical extension of the classification to allow improved diagnostic algorithms is the mapping of entities from the classification to their individual phenotypic features using appropriate phenotypic descriptors from ontologies such as the Human Phenotype Ontology [28]. This creates a matrix of detailed information about each disease entity in both computer-accessible and human-readable formats, and is something that can now be achieved for CMS by a similar consensus process. In addition, since many CMSs are treatable, but the treatment varies by type, we can use the classification to differentiate treatments by type as shown in Table 3 and also now have the opportunity to take this further in a machine-readable manner through the development of pharmacogenomic algorithms that give clinicians easier access to specific treatment recommendations once a particular CMS type has been identified. Furthermore, although NGS techniques have still not solved every CMS case, as science advances, we can expect that new genetic defects will be uncovered that account for some of the remaining undiagnosed congenital myasthenic syndromes, and we have thus ensured that this present classification can easily be extended with new entities.

Conclusions

Knowledge about the full range, etiology and heterogeneity of the congenital myasthenic syndromes has increased rapidly in the NGS era. These diseases present specific challenges owing to their rarity and heterogeneity but also possess certain features – not the least of which is responsiveness to treatment – that make their unambiguous differentiation worthwhile. The benefits of developing a fully granular classification for this group of conditions are thus not purely academic. Although not designed as a diagnostic tool, the detailed classification in a single system of each individual CMS with a defect of neuromuscular transmission as the primary feature provides clinicians and geneticists with an overview of the currently recognized congenital myasthenic syndromes both as individual entities and as logical groupings and this can provide guidance towards the differential diagnoses for a patient with a broad CMS phenotypic presentation. Making use of an unambiguous clinically understandable descriptive name assists in the clinical differentiation of the different diseases, particularly by clinicians less familiar with these rare conditions, while attaching the descriptive name to a code within a recognized coding system enables existing knowledge to be better systematized, thus paving the way towards computer-aided clinical systems and machine-learning algorithms suitable for the NGS era. Through this collaboration between clinical experts and data science experts, we have shown that data science approaches can be used effectively in the clinical domain in a way that does not disrupt preexisting classification by experts and that enhances the utility of preexisting coding systems, building on both to create a more comprehensive result. The classification we have defined can be used in clinical administration systems as an integral part of the Orphanet nomenclature and can be used in scientific publications and clinical case reports to unambiguously define the CMS type in question. It can be extended and modified as required by future scientific advances, but already provides the starting point for the creation of FAIR knowledge bases of data related to the congenital myasthenic syndromes.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Marco Roos, Leiden University Medical Center, NL and David van Enckevort, University Medical Center Groningen, NL for advice on FAIR data.

Funding

RT and HL received funding from the European Union, FP7 Grant No. 30544: RD-Connect and Horizon 2020 Grant No. 779257: Solve-RD, and the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases (G1002274, grant ID 98482). AE received funding from NIH Grant NS109491. The funding bodies had no role in study design or execution or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

BD2K

Big Data to Knowledge

CMS

Congenital myasthenic syndrome

FAIR

Findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable

GA4GH

Global Alliance for Genomics and Health

NGS

Next-generation sequencing

NMJ

Neuromuscular junction

OMIM

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man

Authors’ contributions

RT conceived the work, led the data collection and classification development and authored the manuscript. AA, DB, AGE, BE and EM provided expert input into the classification and revised the manuscript. HL provided guidance on design of the research and the classification and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Rachel Thompson, Email: rae.thompson@gmail.com.

Angela Abicht, Email: angela.abicht@mgz-muenchen.de.

David Beeson, Email: david.beeson@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Andrew G. Engel, Email: age@mayo.edu

Bruno Eymard, Email: bruno.eymard@aphp.fr.

Emmanuel Maxime, Email: emmanuel.maxime@inserm.fr.

Hanns Lochmüller, Email: hlochmuller@toh.ca.

References

  • 1.Bowman JR. Myasthenia gravis in young children; report of three cases, one congenital. Pediatrics. 1948;1(4):472–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ohno K, Hutchinson DO, Milone M, Brengman JM, Bouzat C, Sine SM, Engel AG. Congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by prolonged acetylcholine receptor channel openings due to a mutation in the M2 domain of the epsilon subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(3):758–762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodríguez Cruz Pedro, Palace Jacqueline, Beeson David. The Neuromuscular Junction and Wide Heterogeneity of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(6):1677. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee M, Beeson D, Palace J. Therapeutic strategies for congenital myasthenic syndromes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1412(1):129–136. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ayme S, Bellet B, Rath A. Rare diseases in ICD11: making rare diseases visible in health information systems through appropriate coding. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baynam G, Bowman F, Lister K, Walker CE, Pachter N, Goldblatt J, Boycott KM, Gahl WA, Kosaki K, Adachi T, et al. Improved diagnosis and care for rare diseases through implementation of precision public health framework. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:55–94. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rath A, Olry A, Dhombres F, Brandt MM, Urbero B, Ayme S. Representation of rare diseases in health information systems: the Orphanet approach to serve a wide range of end users. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(5):803–808. doi: 10.1002/humu.22078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maiella Sylvie, Olry Annie, Hanauer Marc, Lanneau Valérie, Lourghi Halima, Donadille Bruno, Rodwell Charlotte, Köhler Sebastian, Seelow Dominik, Jupp Simon, Parkinson Helen, Groza Tudor, Brudno Michael, Robinson Peter N., Rath Ana. Harmonising phenomics information for a better interoperability in the rare disease field. European Journal of Medical Genetics. 2018;61(11):706–714. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bellet B, Olry A (eds.): Procedural document on rare disease nomenclature in English: Orphanet; 2017.
  • 11.Thompson R, Bonne G, Missier P, Lochmüller H. Targeted therapies for congenital myasthenic syndromes: systematic review and steps towards a treatabolome. Emerg Top Life Sci. Submitted. 11/2018.  [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Thompson R, Robertson A, Lochmuller H. Natural history, trial readiness and gene discovery: advances in patient registries for neuromuscular disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:97–124. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.International Society for Biocuration. Biocuration: distilling data into knowledge. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(4):e2002846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Middleton LT. Congenital myasthenic syndromes. 34th ENMC international workshop, 10-11 June 1995. Neuromuscul Disord. 1996;6(2):133–136. doi: 10.1016/0960-8966(95)00037-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Engel AE. 73(rd) ENMC International Workshop: congenital myasthenic syndromes. 22-23 October, 1999, Naarden, the Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2001;11(3):315–321. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(00)00189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chaouch A, Beeson D, Hantai D, Lochmuller H. 186th ENMC international workshop: congenital myasthenic syndromes 24-26 June 2011, Naarden, the Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2012;22(6):566–576. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abicht A, Muller JS, Lochmuller H. Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, LJH B, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle; 1993.
  • 18.Engel AG. Genetic basis and phenotypic features of congenital myasthenic syndromes. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;148:565–589. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD), 11th Revision. 18/06/2018 edn. Geneva; 2018.
  • 20.Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Schiettecatte F, Scott AF, Hamosh A. OMIM.org: online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM(R)), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D789–D798. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rahimzadeh V, Dyke SO, Knoppers BM. An international framework for data sharing: moving forward with the global Alliance for genomics and health. Biopreserv Biobank. 2016;14(3):256–259. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.European Open Science Cloud Nat Genet. 2016;48(8):821. doi: 10.1038/ng.3642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Margolis R, Derr L, Dunn M, Huerta M, Larkin J, Sheehan J, Guyer M, Green ED. The National Institutes of Health's big data to knowledge (BD2K) initiative: capitalizing on biomedical big data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(6):957–958. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mungall CJ, McMurry JA, Kohler S, Balhoff JP, Borromeo C, Brush M, Carbon S, Conlin T, Dunn N, Engelstad M, et al. The monarch initiative: an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D712–D722. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.GO FAIR website [https://www.go-fair.org/] Accessed 30 July 2018.
  • 26.Lochmuller H, Badowska DM, Thompson R, Knoers NV, Aartsma-Rus A, Gut I, Wood L, Harmuth T, Durudas A, Graessner H, et al. RD-Connect, NeurOmics and EURenOmics: collaborative European initiative for rare diseases. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(6):778–785. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0115-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Roos M, Lopez Martin E, Wilkinson MD. Preparing data at the source to Foster interoperability across rare disease resources. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:165–179. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kohler S, Vasilevsky NA, Engelstad M, Foster E, McMurry J, Ayme S, Baynam G, Bello SM, Boerkoel CF, Boycott KM, et al. The human phenotype ontology in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D865–D876. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES