Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2018 Sep 17;77:130–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.09.002

Table 2.

Percentages (and Means and Standard Deviations for Continuous Variables) by Migration Status.

Total Rural children (w/ both parents) Left-behind children Migrant children Urban children (w/ both parents)
Child is male 54.7 54.3 55.5 55.0 54.6
Child’s age 8.3 (3.6) 8.7 (3.7) 8.0 (3.6) 7.8 (3.5) 8.7 (3.6)
PCG is male 15.4 13.7 19.4 12.7 19.0
PCG’s age 41.2 (10.7) 39.4 (8.8) 50.4 (13.1) 37.9 (8.9) 40.6 (9.3)
Sibling
 Child has no sibling 39.3 29.6 25.3 42.3 70.3
 Child has one sibling 44.4 49.8 51.9 44.6 25.3
 Child has 2+ siblings 16.2 20.7 22.8 13.1 4.4
Child is minority 8.4 12.1 9.5 4.4 4.7
Family income quartiles
 Bottom 25% 26.8 41.1 20.7 15.9 17.2
 Lower 25% 25.5 27.8 30.0 24.0 18.3
 Upper 25% 27.7 20.4 33.0 34.4 28.7
 Top 25% 20.0 10.8 16.3 25.6 35.9
Region
 North/Northeast 13.7 16.9 5.1 11.4 18.5
 East 34.0 33.7 25.4 37.0 39.1
 South-Central 31.0 30.6 34.7 33.9 24.2
 West 21.3 18.8 34.8 17.8 18.2
PCG years of education 8.3 (3.9) 7.5 (3.4) 5.8 (3.8) 8.3 (3.4) 11.5 (3.5)
PCG’s emotional distressa 11.2 (3.6) 11.0 (3.5) 12.0 (3.8) 11.3 (3.4) 10.9 (3.5)
PCG’s parenting practicesb 22.9 (7.6) 21.7 (7.6) 19.8 (7.3) 24.4 (7.1) 26.3 (7.0)
Internalizing BPI 15.0 (3.2) 15.0 (3.1) 15.3 (3.1) 15.0 (3.2) 14.8 (3.2)
Externalizing BPI 24.7 (5.5) 24.4 (5.3) 25.1 (5.5) 25.0 (5.6) 24.3 (5.5)

N 4,338 1,692 767 1,104 775
a

Range: 6 – 30

b

Range: 8 – 40