Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Geophys Res Atmos. 2017 Feb 16;122(3):1930–1952. doi: 10.1002/2016JD025583

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Diurnal median comparisons of the estimated latent heat (LH) from the photosynthesis approaches used by JULES [Clark et al., 2011], Song et al. [2009], and photosynthesis-based PX LSM (PX PSN) to compute three potential assimilation rates (Ac, Aj, and Ae), with LH from the PX LSM Jarvis approach [Pleim and Xiu, 1995] and observations at the FLUXNET Harvard Forest US-Ha1 site [Urbanski et al., 2007]. The broadleaf C3 plant simulations use July 2006 US-Ha1 standardized L2 data, with canopy height = 25 m, x = 1 (spherical leaf), αleaf = 0.8 for PAR (leaf absorptivity), αleaf = 0.2 for NIR, forest floor reflectance = 0.10, VCMAX25_0 = 30×10−6 mol m−2 s−1, kn = 0.17, Tlow = 0.0 °C, Tup = 36 °C, leaf scattering coefficient 0.15, quantum yield ε = 0.08 (mol CO2 mol−1 photon), and Jarvis Rstmin = 200 s m−1.