Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Resist Updat. 2018 Aug 25;40:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2018.08.001

Table 3.

Selected parameters of the originally deposited (left column) and re-refined (right column) MBL structures described in the sections ‘Incorrect treatment of ligands’ and ‘Improvement of structural models after re-processing of the diffraction images’. Data prepared as for Table 1.

Protein NDM-1 NDM-1 NDM-1 Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens BJP-1
PDB accession code 4eyl 5n0h 4hky 6ex7 4rl0 5o2e 3m8t 5wcm
Resolution [Å] 74.95–1.90 (1.95–1.90) 74.95–1.90 (1.95–1.90) 74.23–2.00 (2.06–2.00) 74.20–1.951 (2.00–1.95) 67.86–1.30 (1.33–1.30) 67.86–1.30 (1.33–1.30) 22.21–1.33 (1.36–1.33) 50.00–1.20* (1.22 – 1.20)
No. of reflections refinement/Rfree 38308/2030 38308/2030 27161/1446 27008/1353 88894/4618 88894/4618 97262/5123 117432/6083
Completeness [%] 95.79(90.94) 95.79(90.94) 99.50(97.73) 91.72(66.00) 91.38(84.16) 91.38(84.16) 91.85 (89.24) 81.32 (26.78)
<Ι/σ> in the highest resolution shell 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.6 6.9 4.4
R / Rfree [%] 18.7/22.1 15.5/19.8 24.1/26.9 19.4/22.6 15.7/16.5 10.1/13.3 14.3/17.7 13.2/16.0
Protein molecules in the ASU 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
NCS restraints Local Local - -
ADP parametrization Isotropic Isotropic Isotropic+TLS Isotropic+TLS Isotropic Anisotropic Anisotropic+TLS# Anisotropic
No. atoms
    Protein 3500 3520 3487 3498 3499 3705 4043 4031
    Ligands 58 66 77 55 64 63 41 37
    Water 161 398 136 178 645 676 690 829
Ramachandran statistics [%]
    Favored/outliers 97.43/0.43 98.29/0.00 97.41/0.65 99.16/0.00 99.13/0.00 98.73/0.00 96.36/0.38 95.98/0.38
R.m.s. deviations from target values
    Bond lengths [Å] 0.017 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.016 0.013 0.015 0.009
    Bond angles [°] 1.35 1.80 1.80 1.58 2.58 1.62 1.61 1.40
Clashscore/percentile 7.42/90th 2.54/99th 9.15/86th 1.73/100th 7.15/70th 2.28/99th 3.08/97th 0.62/99th
*

The dataset was reprocessed with HKL-3000, and the resolution was extended. Auto-correction mode was used in data scaling which resulted in the elimination of non-informative reflections.

#

This was a redundant combination of ADP parameters.