Table 6. Post-hoc comparisons for classification performance of realistically oriented density gradient growth layouts.
Accuracy | Youden index J | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
model estimates | ||||
estimated mean | standard error est. mean | estimated mean | standard error est. mean | |
1 origin | 0.762 | 0.0013 | 0.450 | 0.0024 |
2 origins | 0.824 | 0.0013 | 0.568 | 0.0024 |
3/4 origins | 0.808 | 0.0013 | 0.567 | 0.0024 |
post-hoc comparisons | ||||
difference est. means | p-value difference est. | difference est. means | p-value difference est. | |
1 vs 2 | -0.066 | 0 | -0.118 | 0 |
1 vs 3/4 | -0.046 | 0 | -0.117 | 0 |
2 vs 3/4 | 0.016 | 0 | 0.001 | 1 |
Post-hoc comparisons were computed to assess how classification accuracy and Youden index J were affected by the Anova factor ‘number of origins’. The upper section shows the marginal means estimated from the Anova-model. The lower section shows the results of the post-hoc tests for differences between the estimated means.