Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;14(11):e1006550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006550

Table 6. Post-hoc comparisons for classification performance of realistically oriented density gradient growth layouts.

Accuracy Youden index J
model estimates
estimated mean standard error est. mean estimated mean standard error est. mean
1 origin 0.762 0.0013 0.450 0.0024
2 origins 0.824 0.0013 0.568 0.0024
3/4 origins 0.808 0.0013 0.567 0.0024
post-hoc comparisons
difference est. means p-value difference est. difference est. means p-value difference est.
1 vs 2 -0.066 0 -0.118 0
1 vs 3/4 -0.046 0 -0.117 0
2 vs 3/4 0.016 0 0.001 1

Post-hoc comparisons were computed to assess how classification accuracy and Youden index J were affected by the Anova factor ‘number of origins’. The upper section shows the marginal means estimated from the Anova-model. The lower section shows the results of the post-hoc tests for differences between the estimated means.