. 2018 Oct 3;18(4):142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.09.003

Table 1.

Comparing several time outcomes (minutes) between the WBCT and selective CT approaches.

Study	Study Design	Subjects number	Time definition	WBCT	Selective CT	P value
- Sierink et al., in 2016⁷	RCT	540 patients for each groups	- Time to diagnosis of life-threatening injuries (min)	50 (38–68)^a	58 (42–78)^a	0.001
			- Time to end of imaging (min) -Time in trauma room (min)	30(24–40)^a 63(47–102)^a	37 (28–52)^a 72 (50–109)^a	<0.0001 0.067
- Huber-Wagner et al., in 2009¹³	Retrospective study	4621 patients	- Time from trauma-room admission to CT (min)	35.5 (26.5)^b	46.6 (37.5)^b	<0.001
- Huber-Wagner et al., in 2013¹⁴	Retrospective study	16719	- Time from hospital admission to CT (min)	24.6 (18)^b	35.2 (25.6)^b	<0.001
- Weninger et al., in 2007¹⁵	Retrospective study	185 patients for each groups	- ED time (min)	70 (17)^b	104 (21)^b	0.025
- Hutter et al., in 2011¹⁶	Retrospective study	1134 patients	- ED time (min)	83.5 (49.2)^b	95.7 (63.1)^b	<0.001
- Wurmb et al., in 2015¹⁷	Retrospective study	318 patients	- Time from ED to operation room	105 (85–133)^a	120 (90–150)^a	<0.05
- Mao et al., in 2012¹⁸	Retrospective study	123 patients	- ED time	124 (60)^b	112 (72)^b	0.359
- Hong et al., in 2016¹⁹	Retrospective study	144 unconscious patients	- ED time	108 (80)^b	186 (168)^b	0.020
- Gordic et al., in 2015²⁰	Retrospective study	120 patients for each groups	- Time to complete trauma related imaging (min)	12 (9)^b	75 (232)^b	<0.001

RCT: Randomized controlled study, ED: Emergency Department, CT: Computed tomography, WBCT: Whole body computed tomography.

Median (IQR25%-75%).

Mean (standard deviation).