Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Syst. 2018 Sep 14;42(10):199. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1060-0

Table 2:

Agreement Between Manual and E-SOFA Scores

SOFA Score Component
(N = 300)
Mean Differencea (95% Confidence Interval) Mean Absolute Differenceb (95% Confidence Interval) Agreementc (95% Confidence Interval)
Cardiovascular −0.02 (−0.64 – 0.60) 0.05 (0.02 – 0.09) 0.97 (0.93 – 1.00)
Respiratory 0.01 (−1.33 – 1.35) 0.32 (0.25 – 0.39) 0.77 (0.70 – 0.84)
Renal 0.33 (−1.95 – 2.61) 0.52 (0.39 – 0.64) 0.63 (0.53 – 0.73)
Hepatic 0.00 (−0.11 – 0.12) 0.00 (0.00 – 0.01) 1.00 (0.99 – 1.00)
Neurologic 0.00 (−0.11 – 0.12) 0.00 (0.00 – 0.01) 1.00 (1.00 – 1.00)
Coagulation 0.01 (−0.24 – 0.26) 0.01 (0.00 – 0.02) 0.99 (0.97 – 1.00)
Full SOFA Score 0.34 (−2.47 – 3.14) 0.80 (0.67 – 0.94) 0.90 (0.87 – 0.93)

SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment

a

mean difference = mean difference between E-SOFA score component and manual SOFA score component

b

mean absolute difference = mean of the absolute value of the difference between E-SOFA score component and manual SOFA score component

c

agreement was measured by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for the full SOFA score, and by weighted Cohen’s Kappa for individual SOFA components