Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2018 Aug 21;125(9):1314–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.06.019

Table 1.

Comparison of the 42 Ophthalmology and Vision Journals That Solicited Work from Cochrane Eyes and Vision @ United States Staff to the “Salient Characteristics of Potential Predatory Journals” by Shamseer et al

Characteristic No. %
The scope of interest includes nonbiomedical subjects alongside biomedical topics 29 69
The website contains spelling and grammatical errors 39 93
Images are distorted or fuzzy, intended to look like something they are not, or are unauthorized 16 38
The homepage language targets authors 20 48
The Index Copernicus value is promoted on the website  4 10
Description of the manuscript handling process is lacking 16 38
Request that manuscripts be sent in via e-mail 31 74
Rapid publication is promised 27 64
There is no retraction policy 27 64
Information on whether and how journal content will be preserved digitally is absent 35 83
The article processing or publication charge is very low (e.g., <$150 United States)  1 2
Journals claiming to be open access either retain copyright of published research or fail to mention copyright 21 50
The contact e-mail address is nonprofessional and not journal affiliated (e.g., @gmail.com or @yahoo.com)  1 2