Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 11;32(6):533–544. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12517

Table 1.

Summary of descriptive characteristics of included studies and reported associations between bariatric surgery and risk of birth defects.

Reference Scorea Location, Data Sources, and Study Details Procedure(s) (Years)b Outcome Assessment BSurg # BD/total (%)c Comparison # BD/total (%)c OR or RR (95% CI)d Variable used in Matching (MV) and Adjustment (AV)
 Any Bariatric Surgery
Sheiner et al. 200431,e

4
Southern Israel
Soroka University Medical Center perinatal database
Population-based birth cohort, 1988-2002
Compared births to women with and without prior BSurg
Restrictive and malabsorptive Reported by obstetrician 15/298 (5.0) 6,333/158,912 (4.0) uOR 1.28f (0.76, 2.15) MV: None
AV: None
Weintraub et al. 200832,e

6
Southern Israel
Soroka University Medical Center perinatal database
Population-based sample of singleton deliveries, 1988-2006, to women who had BSurg
Compared births before and after Bsurg
Restrictive and malabsorptive Reported by obstetrician 40/507 (7.9) 10/301 (3.3) aOR 1.90 (0.88, 4.12) MV: None
AV: Age; Preterm delivery
Josefsson et al. 201344,g

8
Sweden
Medical Birth, Total Population, National Patient and Birth Defects Registries
Population-based, nested case-control study of first live born children, with birth dates before 2010, to women born 1973-1983
Compared infants with and without birth defects
Gastroplasty, gastric banding and gastric bypass Swedish Register of Birth Defectsh 13/318 (4.1) 8,282/244,294 (3.4) aOR 1.09 (0.63, 1.91) MV: None
AV: Early pregnancy BMI; Age; Diabetes; HTN/Preeclampsia; Marital status; Smoking
Abenhaim et al. 201635

6
USA
Health Care Costs and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS)
Birth cohort, 2003-2011
Compared births to women with prior Bsurg and obese (BMI>40 kg/m2 at delivery) women without BSurg
Specific procedures not provided HCUP-NIS database 47/9,587 (0.5) 1,196/221,580 (0.5) aOR 0.74 (0.52, 1.04) MV: None
AV: Age; Cardiovascular disease; Diabetes; Hospital type; HTN; Income; Insurance type; Pulmonary disease; Race; Renal disease
Parent et al. 201736

7
Washington, USA
Birth certificates and linked maternal discharge data from prior hospitalizations
Population-based birth cohort, 1980-2013
Compared births to women with and without prior BSurg
Banded gastroplasty, adjustable gastric band, sleeve gastrectomy and RYGB Birth certificate and discharge diagnosis codesi 403/1,859 (21.7) 1,359/8,437 (16.1) aRR 1.12 (0.99, 1.26) MV: None
AV: Prepregnancy BMI; Age; Birth year; Diabetes; Education; Household income; HTN; Parity; Race/Ethnicity

 Gastric Bypass
Martin et al. 198830

4
Iowa, USA
Self-administered questionnaire
Patients of 4 bariatric surgeons
Compared NTDs in pregnancies before and after BSurg
Specific procedures not provided Maternal report on questionnairej 2/110 (1.8)

NTDs only
0/73 (0.0) -- MV: None
AV: Not relevant
Wittgrove et al. 199837

5
California, USA
Patient interviews and medical records
Patients from one surgical group
Compared pregnancies before and after BSurg
Predominantly RYGB Maternal report during interview NR/36 NR/23 No increased risk of congenital anomalies MV: None
AV: Not relevant
Patel et al. 200839

6
Pennsylvania, USA
Birth logs
Women delivering at a single hospital, 2003-2006
Compared births to women with prior BSurg and 3 groups of women without BSurg: Non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2); Obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2) with no serious co-morbidities; and Morbidly or seriously obese with (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 with serious co-morbidities)
RYGB Not specified 0/26 (0.0) Non-obese: 2/188 1.1)

Obese: 2/39 (5.1)

Morbidly obese: 1/27 (3.7)
--
MV: None
AV: Not relevant
Wax et al. 200840

5
Maine, USA
Data sources not specified
Women delivering in a single maternal-fetal medicine unit
Compared births to women with and without prior Bsurg
RYGB Not specified 0/38 (0.0) 4/76 (5.1) -- MV: Maternal age (<35 or ≥35 years); Prior cesarean
AV: Not relevant
Santulli et al. 201042

6
France
Louis Mourier Hospital’s database
All births, 2004-2010, following Bsurg at a single institution and all deliveries at the same institution
Compared births to women with prior BSurg to 2 groups of women without BSurg: normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ); and matched on prepregnancy BMI
RYGB
Not specified NR/24 Normal BMI: NR/120


BMI-matched: NR/120
No cases of birth defect MV: Age; Parity
AV: Not relevant

MV: Prepregnancy BMI; Age; Parity
AV: Not relevant
Berlac et al. 201433

6
Denmark
National Health and National Birth Registries
Population-based cohort
Compared singleton births to women with prior BSurg and 2 groups of women without BSurg: normal BMI (20-24 kg/m2); and matched on prepregnancy BMI
RYGB (1996-2011) National Birth Registry 30/413 (7.3) Normal BMI: 44/827 (5.3)



BMI-matched: 52/823 (6.3)
uOR 1.39f (0.86, 2.25)



uOR 1.16f (0.73, 1.85)
MV: Age; Parity; Plurality; Year of delivery
AV: None

MV: Prepregnancy BMI; Age; Parity; Plurality; Year of delivery
AV: None
Adams et al. 201543

6
Utah, USA
Utah Population Database and birth certificates
Women who had BSurg in a single surgical practice were linked to births after 1988
Compared births to women with prior BSurg and obese women without BSurg
RYGB (1979-2011) Birth certificates 15/295 (5.1) 12/295 (4.1) uOR 1.26f (0.58, 2.74) MV: Prepregnancy BMI prior to surgery; Age; Birth order; Parity; Race, Year of delivery
AV: None
Johansson et al. 201534,g

7
Sweden
Medical Birth, National Patient and Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registries
Population-based sample of singleton births, 2006-2011
Compared births to women with prior Bsurg to a matched group of women without Bsurg
Predominantly RYGBk (2004-2011) Medical Birth Registryl All women (excluding chromosomal abnormalities): MV: Pre-surgery BMI/Early pregnancy BMI; Age; Education; Parity; Smoking; Year of delivery
AV: History of coexisting conditions; History of substance abuse; Mother’s country of birth
12/590 (2.0) 79/2,334 (3.4) aOR 0.63 (0.34, 1.18)
Restricted to one birth per women (excluding chromosomal abnormalities):
11/549 (2.0) 67/2,110 (3.2) aOR 0.68 (0.35, 1.31)

 Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB)
Lapolla et al. 201041

5
Italy
Databases of the Obesity Centers at Vicenza Regional Hospital and Padova University, phone interviews, and electronic database
Compared pregnancies before and after BSurg and compared pregnancies to women with prior Bsurg to 2 groups of women without BSurg: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 and no diabetes or chronic hypertension; normal weight without gestational diabetes
LAGB (1993-2005) Maternal report and electronic database NR/83 Pre-surgery: NR/27

BMI≥40: NR/120

Normal: NR/858
No birth defects identified MV: None
AV: Not relevant

 Biliopancreatic Diversion (BPD)
Marceau et al. 200438

5
Canada
Laval Hospital
Questionnaire
Compared births before and after Bsurg
BPD (1984-2000) Maternal report 7/167 (4.2) 33/1,257 (2.6) uOR 1.62f (0.71, 3.73) MV: None
AV: None

Abbreviations: AV, variables used to derive adjusted effect estimates; BD, birth defects; BMI, body mass index; BPD, biliopancreatic diversion; Bsurg, bariatric surgery; CI, confidence interval; HTN, hypertension; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; LAGB, Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band; MV, variables used for matching; NR, not reported; NTDs, neural tube defects; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; uOR/aOR, unadjusted/adjusted odds ratio; uRR/aRR, unadjusted/adjusted rate ratio

a

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score is out of a possible 8 for all studies except Josefsson, which is out of a possible 9 because it is a case control study

b

Years during which the bariatric procedures were performed, if specified in the article.

c

If counts were not provided, they were calculated from provided percentage.

d

Effect estimates were not calculated when 0 birth defects were reported in one or more groups. When specific birth defect counts were not specified in the article, a summary of the authors’ comments regarding the frequency of birth defects is provided.

e

There is likely to be overlap between the bariatric surgery cases included in Sheiner et al. 2004 and Weintraub et al. 2008. However, the two studies used different comparison groups.

f

uOR calculated from data provided in the article.

g

There is likely to be overlap between the study populations included in Josefsson et al. 2013 and Johansson et al. 2015.

h

Included ICD-10 codes starting with Q and ICD-9 codes 740.0-759.9.

i

Included ICD-9 codes 740-756.

j

Affected offspring verified by medical record review.

k

98% of procedures were gastric bypass, 2% were gastric banding, and 1% were another type of bariatric surgery.

l

ICD-10 codes for major non-chromosomal malformations.