Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Eye Res. 2018 Aug 8;177:130–144. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.08.002

Table 5.

qPCR analysis of sorted rod photoreceptor and non-rod photoreceptor samples.

Sorted samples Cycle threshold (Ct) values1
rho opn1lw1 opn1lw2 nr2e3 18s
14dpf (larval) xops:eGFP retinas GFP+samples 19.86 No transcript detected3 No transcript detected 24.39 18.98
GFP−samples No transcript detected 22.77 22.18 26.92 18.42
30dpf (juvenile) xops:eGFP retinas GFP+samples 20.37 No transcript detected No transcript detected 25.39 18.19
GFP−samples No transcript detected 21.66 20.89 28.76 17.88
14dpi (regenerated) xops:eGFP retinas GFP+samples 18.65 No transcript detected No transcript detected 25.39 16.95
GFP−samples No transcript detected 20.12 19.74 28.52 16.42
30dpi (regenerated) xops:eGFP retinas GFP+samples 19.30 No transcript detected No transcript detected 26.41 17.01
GFP−samples No transcript detected 21.35 20.53 28.72 16.56
1

Higher Ct values correspond with the presence of less transcript.

2Transcript unreliably detected = transcript quantities approach single copy level (Ct = 34–40).

3

No transcript detected = cycle threshold was “UND” (undetermined) by the instrument.