Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;7(11):425. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110425

Table 2.

Pretransplant characteristics of included studies.

Study Sample Size (tPA vs. Non-tPA) Donor Age (Years) (tPA vs. Non-tPA) MELD Score (tPA vs. Non-tPA) WIT Functional (Min) (tPA vs. Non-tPA) CIT (Min) (tPA vs. Non-tPA)
Seal (2014) [23] 85 vs. 33 36.3 ± 14.8 vs. 38.0 ± 14.9
(P = 0.99)
20.1 ± 8.2 vs. 16.5 ± 10.8
(P = 0.38)
21.1 ± 8.3 vs. 23.5 ± 7.6
(P = 0.16)
306.0 ± 72.0 vs. 258.0 ± 60.0
(P = 0.004)
Eghtesad (Randomized) (2015) [33] 11 vs. 12 61.8 ± 5.9 vs. 56.0 ± 11.0
(P = 0.13)
22.0 ± 5.0 vs. 23.0 ± 5.0
(P = 0.63)
21.0 ± 7.0 vs. 23.0 ± 4.0
(P = 0.40)
389.0 ± 36.0 vs. 373.0 ± 76.0
(P = 0.53)
Eghtesad (Non-randomized) (2015) [33] 35 vs. 22 56.0 ± 9.0 vs. 56.0 ± 11.0
(P = 0.99)
22.0 ± 7.0 vs. 23.0 ± 6.0
(P = 0.58)
25.0 ± 7.0 vs. 24.0 ± 7.0
(P = 0.63)
387.0 ± 68.0 vs. 389.0 ± 107.0
(P = 0.93)
Kubal (2016) [21] 30 vs. 61 31.5 ± 13.3 vs. 36.2 ± 14.7
(P = 0.14)
23.2 ± 8.9 vs. 16.0 ± 5.8
(P < 0.001)
19.0 ± 5.2 vs. 26.2 ± 7.2
(P = 0.01)
288.0 ± 41.5 vs. 429.0 ± 138.5
(P < 0.001)
Bohorquez (2017) [24] 100 vs. 38 37.8 ± 14.6 vs. 37.6 ± 14.6
(P = 0.95)
20.7 ± 5.4 vs. 20.8 ± 5.7
(P = 0.92)
20.4 ± 7.5 vs. 18.7 ± 10.6
(P = 0.3)
304.0 ± 92.2 vs. 240.6 ± 45.7
(P < 0.001)

Non-tPA, non-tissue plasminogen activator group (non-thrombolytic group); tPA, tissue plasminogen activator group (thrombolytic group); MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; WIT, Warm ischemia time; CIT, Cold ischemia time.