Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;7(11):425. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110425

Table 3.

Post-transplant outcomes of included studies.

Study ITBLs (tPA vs. Non tPA) Total Biliary Complications (tPA vs. Non-tPA) Bile Leak (tPA vs. Non-tPA) Anastomotic Strictures (tPA vs. Non-tPA) HAT (tPA vs. Non-tPA) Blood Transfusion (pRBC) (tPA vs. Non-tPA) Graft Survival (1-Year) (tPA vs. Non-tPA) Patient Survival (1-Year) (tPA vs. Non-tPA)
Seal (2014) [23] 2/85 (2.35%) vs. 7/33 (21.21%)
(P = 0.002)
14/85 (16.47%) vs. 11/33 (33.33%)
(P = 0.02)
NA NA NA 3.2 ± 3.4 vs. 3.1 ± 2.3 (P = 0.74) 82/85 (96.47%) vs. 23/33 (69.69%)
(P < 0.001)
83/85 (97.64%) vs. 29/33 (87.87%)
(P = 0.08)
Eghtesad (Randomized + non-randomized) (2015) [33] 1/34 (2.94%) vs. 1/46 (2.17%)
(P = 0.83)
NA NA NA 1/34 (2.94%) vs. 3/46 (6.52%)
(P = 0.40)
NA NA NA
Kubal (2016) [21] 0/30 (0%) vs. 11/61 (18.03%)
(P = 0.01)
8/30 (26.66%) vs. 43/61 (70.50%)
(P < 0.001)
1/30 (3.33%) vs. 4/61 (6.51%)
(P = 0.85)
7/30 (23.33%) vs. 28/61 (45.90%)
(P = 0.06)
0/30 (0%) vs. 2/61 (3.27%)
(P = 0.80)
4.2 ± 3.2 vs. 7.2 ± 6.0 (P = 0.01) 26/30 (86.67%) vs. 49/61 (80.32%)
(P = 0.14)
26/30 (86.67%) vs. 53/61 (86.88%)
(P = 0.90)
Bohorquez (2017) [24] 3/100 (3.0%) vs. 2/38 (5.26%)
(P = 0.63)
25/100 (25.0%) vs. 9/38 (23.68%)
(P = 0.87)
5/100 (5.0%) vs. 2/38 (5.26%)
(P = 0.89)
19/100 (19.0%) vs. 5/38 (13.15%)
(P = 0.42)
3/100 (3.0%) vs. 3/38 (7.89%)
(P = 0.20)
3.4 ± 4.4 vs. 4.5 ± 3.8 (P = 0.16) 92/100 (92.0%) 29/38 (76.31%)
(P = 0.02)
93/100 (93.0%) vs. 33/38 (86.84%)
(P = 0.41)

Non-tPA, non-tissue plasminogen activator group (non-thrombolytic group); tPA, tissue plasminogen activator group (thrombolytic group); ITBLs, ischemic-type biliary lesion; HAT, hepatic artery thrombosis; pRBC, packed red blood cells; NA, not applicable.