Table 3.
Ba,b | SE | P | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Direct effect of satisfaction with life on ZBI | −0.80 | 0.15 | <.001 | (−1.09 to −0.50) |
2. Direct effect of satisfaction with life on PAC | 0.32 | 0.07 | <.001 | (0.18 to 0.46) |
3. Direct effect of positive aspects of caregiving on ZBI | −0.45 | 0.13 | <.005 | (−0.70 to −0.20) |
4. Indirect effect via positive aspects of caregiving | −0.14 | 0.07 | <.001 | (−0.31 to −0.04) |
5. Total effect of satisfaction with life and PAC | −0.94 | 0.15 | <.001 | (−1.22 to −0.65) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PAC, Positive Aspects of Caregiving; SE, Singapore elderly; ZBI, Zarit Burden Interview.
aControlled for age, gender, ethnicity, education, marital, employment status, and relationship to care recipient.
b Coefficients are unstandardized.