Table 3.

Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting Income and Antisocial Behavior at Age 22

		Main Effect of Socioeconomic Resources		Main Effect of Amygdala Reactivity		Interaction		R2
Age 22 Outcome	Neural Contrast	B(SE)	β	B(SE)	β	B(SE)	β
Income	All faces	1.70 (.67)	.17*	−4.52 (1.33)	−.45**§	6.62 (2.41)	.33**§	.13***§
	Fearful faces	1.85 (.65)	.19**§	−.91 (1.43)	−.09	.69 (1.23)	.09	.08*
Antisocial Behavior	All faces	−.18 (.13)	−.08	−.12 (.27)	−.05	.38 (.64)	.09	.36***§
	Fearful faces	−.25 (.13)	−.12†	.68 (.21)	.32**§	−.45 (.17)	−.26**§	.38***§

Note: N=258. Socioeconomic resources and amygdala reactivity measured at age 20. Amygdala reactivity represents a mean of activity across right and left amygdala regions of interest. All models include child race as a covariate. Models with antisocial behavior as the outcome also include antisocial behavior at age 20 as a covariate and models predicting income additionally include schooling status (i.e., in school or not) and housing status (i.e., living with family or independently) as covariates. Note that including income at age 20 as a covariate rather than as an indicator in the socioeconomic resource index, did not change that the results of our models predicting income at age 22.

^†p < .10.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.

^§survives Bonferonni correction for multiple comparisons across all 4 regressions (p < .012)