Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;18(11):3671. doi: 10.3390/s18113671

Table 4.

Expert Satisfaction Evaluation Items.

Category Question
Rule-based system Q1. The variables that appear in the rules are adequate
Q2. The variables’ labels are adequate
Q3. The rule-based system can capture my knowledge about how to adapt each exercise
Q4. The help-activation system is suitable for this type of rehabilitation
Q5. The difficulty-adaptation system improves the rehabilitation
Used sensors Q6. The used sensors collect the patient’s information required to perform these exercises
Q7. The information collected by the EEG sensor for stress detection is of interest for the treatment of the patient
Q8. The haptic stimulator helps to carry out the exercises
Q9. The sensors do not limit the movement of the patient
Q10. The system can be use easily by patients with the assistance of a caregiver/family
Remote monitoring Q11. The activity viewer helps me follow the evolution of the exercise
Q12. The patient’s results viewer is straightforward
Q13. I can get all the data I need through the results viewer
Q14. Thanks to the results viewer I do not consider my presence to be necessary during the rehabilitation session
Q15. The information on the result viewer is displayed appropriately
Other Overall satisfaction with the proposal