(A) Effect of hepatic USP22 overexpression on SIRT1 induction by fasting. Immunoblotting for SIRT1 and USP22 (center) in the liver homogenates and SIRT1 quantification (far right). WT and Gna12-KO mice at 12 weeks of age were hydrodynamically injected with the plasmid expressing USP22 or control vector (Mock) (n = 3–5/group) (left). Third panel shows densitometric analysis for USP22 in the liver (n = 3–5/group). (B) Representative oil red O staining (left) and hepatic TG contents (right) (n = 3–5/group). Scale bars: 100 μm. (C) Effect of hepatic SIRT1 overexpression on CPT1 induction by fasting. Immunoblotting for SIRT1 and CPT1 (center) in the liver homogenates and their respective quantifications (right) (n = 3–4/group). WT and Gna12-KO mice at 15 weeks of age were injected with the adenovirus carrying mouse SIRT1 (Ad-SIRT1, 2.8 × 109 PFU/mouse) or GFP control (Ad-Con)via the tail vein (left). (D) Representative oil red O staining (left) and TG contents (right) in liver tissues (n = 3–4/group). Original magnification, ×20. (E) Effect of SIRT1 overexpression on OCR in AML12 cells. OCR was measured in AML12-sh-Gα12 (or AML12-sh-Luci) cells infected with Ad-SIRT1 (or Ad-Con) in the presence of oligomycin (1 μM), carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP) (1 μM), or rotenone plus antimycin A (0.5 μM each). Results represent 4 independent experiments (n = 6–8 replicates/group for each experiment). Values represent mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by 2-tailed Student’s t test (A, USP22) or ANOVA followed by LSD (A [SIRT1], C, and E) or Bonferroni’s (B and D) post hoc tests. For A–D, only fasted groups were analyzed for ease of data presentation. For A and C, blots in each panel were run in parallel using the same samples and β-actin was used as a normalization control for densitometric analysis.