Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct 28;32(11):e13410. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13410

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression models illustrating the relationship between TUGT times and short-term outcomes of (i) waitlist removal, (ii) length of stay >7days, (iii) readmission within 30 days.

(i)
Wait List Removal*
Parameters Adjusted OR p-value
TUGT (seconds) 0.930(0.720–1.200) 0.576
Age at TUGT (years) 1.063(0.980–1.153) 0.138
EPTS (%) 1.000(0.965–1.037) 0.982
(ii)
Length of Stay >7 days
Deceased Donor Transplant Living Donor Transplant
Parameters Adjusted OR p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
TUGT (seconds) 1.091(0.941–1.264) 0.248 0.940(0.707–1.249) 0.669
Age at TUGT (years) 1.007(0.964–1.053) 0.746 0.966(0.921–1.014) 0.159
EPTS (%) 1.010(0.990–1.031) 0.326 1.029(0.999–1.060) 0.055
(iii)
Readmission Within 30 Days
Deceased Donor Transplant Living Donor Transplant
Parameters Adjusted OR p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
TUGT (seconds) 0.980(0.838–1.146) 0.800 1.172(0.900–1.526) 0.239
Age at TUGT (years) 1.005(0.961–1.050) 0.837 1.016(0.960–1.075) 0.588
EPTS (%) 1.000(0.979–1.022) 0.994 1.015(0.984–1.046) 0.357
*

Patient who were transplanted with a living or deceased donor kidney were excluded (n = 246)

Transplanted patients included (n = 272)