Table 1.
Results of two‐way ANOVA comparison between the daily profiles of Per2, Nr1d1 and Bmal1 expression in the pup SCN
| Per2 | Nr1d1 | Bmal1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCN controls vs. cross‐strain | F(DFn, DFd) | P | F(DFn, DFd) | P | F(DFn, DFd) | P | |
| Wistar P10 | Interaction | F 6,52 = 6.002 | <0.0001 | F 6,51 = 5.309 | 0.0003 | F 6,51 = 2.217 | 0.0562 |
| Time | F 6,52 = 110.3 | <0.0001 | F 6,51 = 136.6 | <0.0001 | F 6,51 = 29.92 | <0.0001 | |
| Group | F 1,52 = 3.192 | 0.0798 | F 1,51 = 13.38 | 0.0006 | F 1,51 = 5.724 | 0.0205 | |
| SHR P10 | Interaction | F 6,54 = 1.468 | 0.2068 | F 6,54 = 1.105 | 0.3718 | F 6,54 = 2.231 | 0.0538 |
| Time | F 6,54 = 190.9 | <0.0001 | F 6,54 = 62.02 | <0.0001 | F 6,54 = 33.53 | <0.0001 | |
| Group | F 1,54 = 0.1834 | 0.6701 | F 1,54 = 9.511 | 0.0032 | F 1,54 = 9.711 | 0.0029 | |
| Wistar P30 | Interaction | F 6,45 = 1.821 | 0.1164 | F 6,53 = 2.128 | 0.0652 | F 6,51 = 0.9615 | 0.4605 |
| Time | F 6,45 = 100.4 | <0.0001 | F 6,53 = 55.36 | <0.0001 | F 6,51 = 32.53 | 0.0001 | |
| Group | F 1,45 = 3.114 | 0.0844 | F 1,53 = 12.31 | 0.0009 | F 1,51 = 5.194 | 0.0269 | |
| SHR P30 | Interaction | F 6,49 = 2.785 | 0.0207 | F 6,48 = 1.955 | 0.0909 | F 6,48 = 2.036 | 0.0788 |
| Time | F 6,49 = 116.1 | <0.0001 | F 6,48 = 102.7 | <0.0001 | F 6,48 = 30.21 | <0.0001 | |
| Group | F 1,49 = 2.027 | 0.1609 | F 1,48 = 3.781 | 0.0577 | F 1,48 = 0.4667 | 0.4978 | |
Daily profiles of clock gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of 10‐day‐old (P10) and 30‐day‐old (P30) Wistar rat and SHR pups reared by their own mothers (controls) or exposed to cross‐strain fostering (cross‐strain). F test distribution ratio (F), degrees of freedom in the variance of numerator (DFn) and denominator (DFd), P value (P). Significant differences are indicated in bold.