Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 30;38(6):BSR20180694. doi: 10.1042/BSR20180694

Table 3. Meta-analysis results based on different genetic models.

S.No. Category OR [95%CI] PZ PH I2 (%) Statistical method
1. Dominant model (GG vs GA+AA) 0.81 [0.60–1.09] 0.17 <0.0001 72% Random
2. Recessive model (GG+GA vs AA) 1.23 [0.96–1.59] 0.11 0.001 64% Random
3. Co-dominant model (AA vs GG) 1.35 [0.93, 1.97] 0.12 <0.0001 72% Random
4. Co-dominant model (GA vs GG) 1.16 [0.85, 1.59] 0.34 0.0002 69% Random
5. Allele model (A vs G) 1.20 [1.14–2.85] 0.23 <0.00001 82% Random
6. Allele model (G vs A) 0.83 [0.62–1.12] 0.23 <0.00001 82% Random

Abbreviations: PH, P value for heterogeneity; PZ, P value for Z-test.