Table 3. Meta-analysis results based on different genetic models.
S.No. | Category | OR | [95%CI] | PZ | PH | I2 (%) | Statistical method |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Dominant model (GG vs GA+AA) | 0.81 | [0.60–1.09] | 0.17 | <0.0001 | 72% | Random |
2. | Recessive model (GG+GA vs AA) | 1.23 | [0.96–1.59] | 0.11 | 0.001 | 64% | Random |
3. | Co-dominant model (AA vs GG) | 1.35 | [0.93, 1.97] | 0.12 | <0.0001 | 72% | Random |
4. | Co-dominant model (GA vs GG) | 1.16 | [0.85, 1.59] | 0.34 | 0.0002 | 69% | Random |
5. | Allele model (A vs G) | 1.20 | [1.14–2.85] | 0.23 | <0.00001 | 82% | Random |
6. | Allele model (G vs A) | 0.83 | [0.62–1.12] | 0.23 | <0.00001 | 82% | Random |
Abbreviations: PH, P value for heterogeneity; PZ, P value for Z-test.