Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;15(11):2411. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112411

Table 2.

Comparison of scale scores for depressive symptoms between the negative and positive groups.

Scale (Range of Score) Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient Depressive Symptoms *1 p-Value Effect Size d or r Difference of 95% CI
Negative Positive
n M SD n M SD Lower Upper
The FPAM scale *2
Caring for a child (3–12) 0.86 154 5.3 2.1 134 6.1 2.4 0.004 0.36 −1.29 −0.24
Giving birth to a baby (3–12) 0.65 154 6.6 1.7 134 7.0 1.8 0.041 0.29 −0.83 −0.02
Self-esteem (10–40) 0.71 154 24.2 4.3 134 22.7 4.5 0.003 0.36 0.55 2.60
Self-efficacy (0–16) 0.80 154 6.5 3.9 134 5.4 3.6 0.016 0.29 0.20 1.99
Perception of radiation risk (2-item score: 2–8) 154 4.8 1.3 134 4.6 1.4 0.161 0.15 −0.09 0.52
Delayed effects (1–4) *3 154 2.0 134 2.0 0.100 0.10
Genetic effects (1–4) *3 154 2.0 134 2.0 0.427 0.05

*1 Participants in the positive group for depressive symptoms scored 1 or 0 for any of the 5 World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index items or had an overall score of <13. Number of missing data: FPAM = 5, self-esteem = 2, self-efficacy = 8. *2 FPAM = Fukushima Future Parents Attitude Measure. *3 We conducted a Mann-Whitney U test and calculated the median.