Figure 1.

CONSORT and recruitment flow diagrams for swallowing difficulties assessment. For phase 1, the sensitivity and specificity were assessed for 2 potential screeners versus the FACT‐E swallowing index in gastroesophageal cancer patients. For phase 2, dual assessments of feasibility/patient acceptability (1‐question and 2‐question screeners) and sensitivity/specificity of the 1‐question screener versus a Patient Reported Outcomes for Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO‐CTCAE) gold standard. SICV, Swallowing Index Cut‐off Value