Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;1(7):e48. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.48

Table 3.

Assessment of sensitivities and specificities of screening questions in phases 1 and 2a

Phase 1: screener 1, “How are you currently eating”
Cut‐off values for gold standard True positive True negative False positive False negative Sensitivity Specificity
SICV Prevalence of having swallowing difficulty using this cut‐off
5.5 3.9% 6 108 63 1 86% 63%
7.1 10.1% 15 106 54 3 83% 66%
12.16 25.3% 36 100 33 9 80% 75%
13.3 32.0% 44 96 25 13 77% 79%
14.5 37.6% 48 90 21 19 72% 81%
16 44.4% 52 82 17 27 66% 83%
Phase 1: screener 2, “I can swallow naturally and easily”
Cut‐off values for gold standard True positive True negative False Positive False negative Sensitivity Specificity
SICV Prevalence of having swallowing difficulty using this cut‐off
5.5 3.9% 3 98 73 2 71% 57%
7.1 10.1% 12 96 64 6 67% 60%
12.16 25.3% 30 85 48 15 67% 64%
13.3 32.0% 35 80 41 22 61% 66%
14.5 37.6% 40 78 33 27 60% 70%
16 44.4% 45 75 24 34 57% 76%
Phase 2 single question screener: difficulty swallowing question
None/not at all only in all subsequent questions vs all others 61 33 0 4 94% 100%
Phase 2 single question screener: pain swallowing question
None/not at all in all subsequent questions only vs all others 24 38 3 4 86% 93%

Abbreviation: SICV, Swallowing Index Cut‐off Value.

a

For phase 1, screener 1, response choices were “normal,” “eats soft food only,” “eats pureed food only,” “drinks liquid only,” and “no swallowing at all.”