Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 16;9(11):602. doi: 10.3390/mi9110602

Table 1.

Performance summary of tri-axial multiple proof-mass accelerometers.

Ref Year Author Device Size (mm × mm) Range (‘±g’) Sensitivity X, Y, and Z Noise (μg/Hz) X, Y, and Z Nonlinearity X, Y, and Z Cross-Axis Sensitivity X, Y, and Z
[8] 1999 Lemkin, M. 4 × 4 (including read out) 1.9 Digital Output (0.4 fF/bit) 110, 160, 990 - -
[39] 1999 Matsumoto, Y. 5 × 5 - 25 fF/g,
25 fF/g,
100 fF/g
<10%
[41] 2000 Butefisch, S. 9 × 9 - 210 mV/g - R2 = 0.997 -
990 mV/g R2 = 0.99
[43] 2005 Rodjegard, H. 2.5 × 2 - 1.27 fF/g,
1.27 fF/g,
0.82 fF/g
- - 0.12 fF/g
[44] 2005 Chae, J. 7 × 9 1 6.8 pF/g,
6.8 pF/g,
2.9 pF/g
1.6, 1.6, 1.08 - -
[47] 2013 Liu, Y.C. 1.57 × 1.73 0.01~2 105 mV/g,
127 mV/g,
58 mV/g
400, 210, 940 1%, 0.5%, 2.4% 3%, 2.3%, 8.8%
[49] 2015 Tez, S. 12 × 7 10 (X, Y)
+12, −7 (Z)
- 5.4, 5.5, 12.6 0.34%, 0.28%, 0.41% <1%
[50] 2016 Aydemir, A. 11.8 × 4.8 4 70.2 mV/g,
70.4 mV/g,
21.6 mV/g
13.9, 13.2, 17.8 0.26%, 0.28%, 0.3% <1%
71 (X, Y)
231 (Z)
estimated