Public (from the EKC) |
1. Energy price is reduced [40]; |
Very supportive |
2. Income is increased to deal with environmental pollution [37]; |
3. The satisfaction of environmental governance is fairly significant [41]; |
Government (from the pollution haven hypothesis) |
1. The regulatory costs of the government should be significantly decreased [24]; |
Very supportive |
2. the penalties for polluters should be increased [42]; |
Enterprises (from the pollution haven hypothesis) |
1. Increasing profits is the main aim, whereas environmental protection is not [43]; |
Very supportive |
2. The image of social responsibilities of environmental protection should be formed [44]; |
3. New technology or renewable energy should be developed or introduced in order to reduce the cost of pollution [45]. |