Table 1.
Measures of effectiveness include the efficacy index, uncorrected visual acuity (expressed as logMAR), and the accuracy of refractive correction expressed as percentages within 0.5 and 1.0 D of target
| References | n eyes | N patients | Follow-up months | Efficacy index | Mean logMAR UDVA | ±0.50 D | ±1.0 D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shimizu et al 201248 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 1.03±0.30 | −0.20±0.12 | 95.0% | 100.0% |
| Alfonso et al 201325 | 138 | 70 | 6 | 1.00 | 0.009±0.062 | 98.5% | 100.0% |
| Higueras-Esteban et al 201329 | 18 | 10 | 3 | NR | −0.07±0.11 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Huseynova et al 201423 | 44 | 44 | 3 | 1.03 | 0.13±0.08 (0.10–0.30) | NR | NR |
| Lisa et al 201524 | 147 | 80 | 12 | 1.00 | 0.028±0.055 | 93.9% | 100.0% |
| Fernández-Vigo et al 201649 | 50 | 25 | 3 | NR | 0.05±0.11 | NR | NR |
| Liu et al 201643 | 82 | 42 | 5 | 1.27 | −0.03±0.08 | NR | NR |
| Shimizu et al 201622 | 32 | 32 | 60 | NR | −0.17±0.14 (0.15–0.30) | 88.0% | 96.0% |
| Cao et al 201650 | 63 | 32 | 6 | 1.11±0.19 | 0.118±0.096 | NR | NR |
| Cao et al 201651 | 78 | 39 | 6 | NR | 0.136±0.104 (0.000–0.301) | NR | NR |
| Iijima et al 201645 | 29 | 29 | 3 | NR | 0.04±0.21 (0.52–0.30) | NR | NR |
| Park et al 201752 (central port within 1, 2, or 3 port diameters of pupil center) | 46 | NR | 3 | NR | −0.01±0.06 | NR | NR |
| 42 | NR | 3 | NR | −0.04±0.07 | NR | NR | |
| 6 | NR | 3 | NR | −0.03±0.08 | NR | NR | |
| Tian et al 201744 | 18 | 18 | 1 | NR | −0.02 | NR | NR |
| Kamiya et al 201721 (myopia <6, ≥6 D) | 57 | 57 | 12 | NR | −0.17±0.14 (−0.30–0.30) | 93.0% | 98.0% |
| 294 | 294 | 12 | NR | −0.16±0.09 (−0.30–0.15) | 94.0% | 99.0% | |
| Garcia-de La Rosa et al 201853 | 76 | 42 | 12 | NR | 0.12±0.12 | NR | NR |
| Hyun et al 201754 | 24 | 24 | 8 | 1.09 | 0.01±0.07 (−0.10–0.15) | NR | NR |
| Fernández-Vigo et al 201731 | 54 | 27 | 24 | NR | 0.02±0.10 (0.1–0.2) | NR | NR |
| Ganesh et al 201735 | 30 | 30 | 12 | 1.12 | −0.022±0.021 | NR | NR |
| Pjano et al 201734 | 28 | 16 | 12 | 1.20 | 0.13 | NR | NR |
| Liu et al 201855 | 40 | 22 | 3 | NR | −0.04±0.05 | NR | NR |
| Zhao et al 201856 | 37 | 19 | 18 | 0.95 | 0.03±0.05 | NR | NR |
| Lee et al 201826 | 52 | 52 | 6 | 1.35±0.19 | NR | 88.0% | 100.0% |
| Miao et al 201857 | 67 | 38 | 3 | 1.14±0.23 | −0.01±0.09 | 72.0% | 95.0% |
| Takahashi et al 201858 | 42 | 21 | 6 | NR | −0.03±0.20 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Yan et al 201820 | 61 | 32 | 24 | 1.03±0.23 | 0.08 | 79.0% | 98.0% |
| Kojima et al 2018 (V4c, V5)67 | 23 | 23 | 6 | 1.16±0.22 | −0.23±0.09 | 94.7% | 100.0% |
| 23 | 23 | 6 | 1.03±0.23 | −0.19±0.12 | 84.2% | 100.0% | |
| Fernández-Vega-Cueto et al 201836 | 184 | 92 | 36 | 0.90 | NR | 74.5% | 91.8% |
| Total number of eyes reported | Weighted averages | ||||||
| 1,905 | 12.5 | 1.04 | −0.02 | 90.8% | 98.7% | ||
Abbreviations: NR, not reported; UDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity.