Table 2.
The quality assessment of scales.
| Author Year [Ref] | Content Validity | Reliability | Criterion Validity | Construct Validity (EFA and/or CFA) | Total Points | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Informed by Literature Review | Panel of Experts | Empirical Study | Reviewed by Target Population | Internal Consistency | Test-Retest | Factors Explained ≥50% of the Variance | Included at Least 3 Items | Variables Loading | Based on 10 Cases per Variable | |||
| Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Yes = 1 No = 0 |
0–3 Points | 0–3 Points | 0–3 Points | Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Yes = 1 No = 0 |
Maximum Points = 17 | |
| Renzaho et al., 2016 [18] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Bahta et al., 2016 [54] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Bareki et al., 2017 [55] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bunting et al., 2013 [56] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kolawole et al., 2016 [57] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 * | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Belle et al., 2015 [29] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Thomas et al., 2007 [58] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mlenga et al., 2015 [59] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mlenga et al., 2016 [60] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Akpalu et al., 2005 [61] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hudson et al., 2002 [62] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Shongew et al., 2014 [63] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mason 2005 [64] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
* Denotes item mentioned in the report without stating details.