Table 1.

The inductive thematic analysis used in this study

Phase 1 Data Familiarisation	This involved the main author, LM, reading the first transcript closely a number of times and checking the transcript back against the original audio recording for accuracy. Each review of the recordings provided some new understandings and LM began taking personal notes focusing on content, language use, context, and initial interpretative comments.
Phase 2 Initial Code Generalisation	LM coded interesting features of the data using the computer software NVivo for qualitative data administration. LM worked methodically through the full data set. She gave complete and uniform consideration to each item, tagging and naming selections of text with each data item.
Phase 3 Theme search	Merging and deviation of themes within the data were noted, leading to the development of the next phase, transforming codes into emergent themes. This involved LM working more with her notes rather than with the transcript and again inputting findings into the NVivo software package.
Phase 4 Theme review	LM firstly ensured all coded data extracts formed a coherent pattern and then progressed to considering the validity of each individual theme
Phase 5 Theme naming	LM scanned for links between emergent themes, assembling them according to conceptual similarities. Each cluster was then allocated a descriptive label. Using NVivo allowed for short descriptions of themes and subthemes, using links to appropriate passages in the transcript.
Phase 6 Final Report	LM produced a report of the analysis undertaken.