Skip to main content
. 2012 May 30;17(6):6491–6506. doi: 10.3390/molecules17066491

Table 2.

Reducing power (absorbance values at 700 nm) of peel and pulp extracts from different varieties of peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit.

Variety Conc. (mg/mL) Pulp Peel
Golden 0.0 0.060 ± 0.005 0.090 ± 0.008
2.5 0.34 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.04
5.0 0.61 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.03
7.5 0.95 ± 0.01 1.19 ± 0.02
10.0 1.12 ± 0.04 1.87 ± 0.05
12.5 1.99 ± 0.02 2.77 ± 0.04
Mean 0.85 ± 0.02 a 1.20 ± 0.07 b
Shireen 0.0 0.040 ± 0.003 0.050 ± 0.004
2.5 0.31 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.05
5.0 0.58 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.04
7.5 0.84 ± 0.04 1.10 ± 0.07
10.0 1.09 ± 0.06 1.66 ± 0.06
12.5 1.87 ± 0.05 2.57 ± 0.08
Mean 0.73 ± 0.01 a 1.12 ± 0.05 b
Shahpasand 0.0 0.030 ± 0.002 0.070 ± 0.009
2.5 0.29 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.03
5.0 0.48 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.05
7.5 0.79 ± 0.05 1.17 ± 0.04
10.0 0.99 ± 0.04 1.74 ± 0.05
12.5 1.54 ± 0.03 2.66 ± 0.09
Mean 0.68 ± 0.01 a 1.17 ± 0.03 b

Data are mean (n = 3) SD ± (n = 3, p < 0.05); Different superscript letters within the Mean’s rows indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between peel and pulp.