Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 30;17(4):3917–3932. doi: 10.3390/molecules17043917

Table 3.

Antimicrobial activity of different solvent extracts from bark of P. pinnata.

Tested organisms Bark extracts
Absoluteethanol Aqueous ethanol Absolutemethanol Aqueous methanol Absoluteacetone Aqueous acetone Deionizedwater Amoxicillin Flumequine
Diameter of inhibition zone (mm)
Pseudomonas stutzeri 12.8 ± 0.8 bc 16.3 ± 0.7 b 15.6 ± 0.5 b 21.5 ± 0.5 a 11.6 ± 0.5 c 12.3 ± 0.8 bc 11.0 ± 0.3 c 24.2± 1.2 a -----
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 10.3 ± 0.4 bc 13.9 ± 0.4 b 12.6 ± 0.4 bc 19.3 ± 0.4 a 9.2 ± 0.3 c 9.8 ± 0.3 c 10.0 ± 0.4 c 21.3± 0.9 a -----
Escherichia coli 8.8 ± 0.4 c 11.3 ± 0.3 b 10.8 ± 0.4 b 16.7 ± 0.5 a 8.1 ± 0.3 c 8.4 ± 0.3 c 8.0 ± 0.3 c 18.2± 1.0 a -----
Aspergillus orazae 13.1 ± 0.2 bc 17.5 ± 0.2 b 16.5 ± 0.7 b 26.2 ± 0.8 a 11.8 ± 0.4 bc 12.1 ± 0.5 bc 9.8 ± 0.3 c ----- 28.5 ± 1.2 a
Aspergillus niger 12.9 ± 0.8 bc 14.1 ± 0.6 ab 13.5 ± 0.5 b 24.7 ± 0.8 ab 10.9 ± 0.4 bc 9.0 ± 0.3 c 8.5 ± 0.2 c ----- 26.2 ± 1.2 a
Fusarium solani 12.0 ± 0.7 b 13.1 ± 0.5 b 11.7 ± 0.4 b 22.9 ± 0.5 a 9.2 ± 0.5 bc 8.1 ± 0.3 c 7.5 ± 0.2 c ----- 24.3 ± 1.2 a
Minimum inhibitory concentration (mg/mL)
Pseudomonas stutzeri 51 ± 2 b 48 ± 2 b 36 ± 2 bc 26 ± 1 c 62 ± 1 a 58 ± 2 a 60 ± 2 a 23 ± 1 d -----
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 60 ± 3 c 58 ± 3 c 39 ± 1 cd 29 ± 3 d 80 ± 2 a 71 ± 1 b 76 ± 3 ab 25 ± 1 d -----
Escherichia coli 66 ± 3 ab 65 ± 1 ab 41 ± 2 c 36 ± 2 c 86 ± 2 a 78 ± 2 ab 79 ± 2 b 32 ± 2 d -----
Aspergillus orazae 48 ± 1 ab 46 ± 2 ab 42 ± 2 b 22 ± 1 b 24 ± 1 a 52 ± 2 a 54 ± 1 a ----- 20 ± 1 c
Aspergillus niger 51 ± 3 ab 48 ± 3 ab 46 ± 1 ab 29 ± 2 b 28 ± 2 a 65 ± 3 a 67 ± 2 a ----- 28 ± 1 c
Fusarium solani 58 ± 2 ab 55 ± 2 ab 53 ± 3 ab 36 ± 3 b 36 ± 2 a 72 ± 3 a 74 ± 3 a ----- 33 ± 2 c

Values are mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Different superscript letters within the same row indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences of means within the extracting solvents.