Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 5;17(6):6869–6885. doi: 10.3390/molecules17066869

Table 4.

Foaming stability (%) of tamarillo and commercial hydrocolloids.

Hydrocolloids Foaming stability (%) at time, t (min)
t = 1 t = 10 t = 30 t = 60 t = 90 t = 120
THwater 97.59 aA 91.96 aB 84.99 aC 81.51 aD 79.36 aE 79.36 aE
Agar-agar 100 bA 0 bB 0 bB 0 bB 0 bB 0 bB
Apple pectin 100 bA 100 cA 100 cA 50 cB 50 cB 50 cB
Bovine gelatine 90.36 cA 51.80 dB 31.57 dC 23.87 dD 19.77 dE 11.01 dF
Carrageenan n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Citrus pectin 66.67dA 66.67 eA 66.67 eA 66.67 eA 66.67 eA 66.67 eA
CMC n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Gum arabic 90.46 cA 82.37 fB 66.77 eC 46.40 fD 28.69 fE 22.25 fF
Karaya gum 97.62 aA 85.79 gB 75.87 fC 75.87 gC 63.1 gD 48.73 gE
Sodium alginate 100 bA 100 cA 100 cA 50 cB 25 hC 12.5 hD
Wheat starch n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Xanthan gum n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

Each value is expressed as mean (n = 3) of triplicate analysis with standard deviation < 1. n.d.: Not determined since foaming capacity of the hydrocolloid is 0. a–h Means followed by different superscript lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within column by Tukey’s test. A–F Means followed by different superscript uppercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within row by Tukey’s test.