Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 9;17(3):2955–2967. doi: 10.3390/molecules17032955

Table 3.

Screening results of the antimicrobial activities of the extracts from 30 Chinese medicinal plants (IZD: mm) a.

No. Species Part b Weight (g) c Ratio (%) d SA e EC f PA g CA h
1 A. nepalensis TBL 3.85 7.7 14 <8 12 9
2 B. balsamifer WP 0.61 1.2 12 9 <8 5
3 B. hancei WP 4.96 9.9 19 10 13 11
4 C. austroglauca TBL 1.50 3.0 23 14 15 9
5 C. japonica V 1.57 3.1 9 11 13 8
6 C. orbiculatus V 2.06 4.1 11 10 <8 10
7 C. orchioides WP 2.28 4.6 16 13 14 8
8 C. prainii WP 1.96 3.9 10 10 <8 9
9 E. Burm L 3.03 6.1 10 10 10 <8
10 E. daneillii TBL 2.52 5.0 18 12 10 9
11 E. fortunei V 4.42 8.8 15 13 12 11
12 E. laxiflorus TBL 2.68 5.4 <8 <8 <8 10
13 G. morella WP 7.38 14.8 17 12 <8 <8
14 I. simonsii TBL 3.48 7.0 13 11 11 8
15 K. angustifolia TBL 0.99 2.0 <8 8 <8 8
16 L. lancifolia TBL 2.28 4.6 <8 <8 <8 <8
17 M. hongheensis TBL 3.09 6.2 21 11 13 <8
18 M. salicina TBL 2.91 5.8 12 9 8 10
19 M. squamulata TBL 1.48 2.9 17 12 12 11
20 M. yunnanensis TBL 2.91 5.8 24 12 <8 9
21 O. javanica WP 2.65 5.3 <8 8 <8 <8
22 P. edulis TBL 4.49 9.0 <8 <8 <8 <8
23 P. molle WP 2.99 6.0 11 10 16 12
24 R. japonicus WP 5.24 10.5 <8 9 8 <8
25 S. arborescens TBL 1.86 3.7 24 13 14 11
26 S. davidii TBL 2.54 5.1 <8 8 9 10
27 S. parasitica TBL 1.04 2.1 <8 <8 <8 <8
28 S. sinensis TBL 6.49 13.0 18 8 13 21
29 S. tamariscina WP 4.44 8.9 12 9 11 9
30 S. viridis V 2.63 5.3 12 <8 <8 9

a IZD: Inhibition zone diameter (the concentration of the extract at 50 mg/mL); b Part: The part of plant used for extraction (L: leaves; TBL: tender branches and leaves; WP: whole plant; V: vane); c Weight: The weight of extract; d Ratio: The ratio of extract; e SA: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923, MSSA); f EC: Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922); g PA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853); h CA: Candida albicans (ATCC Y0109).