1. Recruiters were members of the study community and highlighted their similarities to potential participants |
2. Community connections were nurtured to build trust |
3. Materials that demonstrated university and organization affiliations legitimized studies |
4. Social networks and social media were harnessed |
5. Study uniqueness was emphasized |
6. Potential participants were not pressured to enroll |
7. “Good will” and a sense of commitment to community were tapped into |
8. Recruitment materials were concise, tailored, and engaging |
9. Teasers and samples of incentives were provided |
10. Adapting to potential participants’ changing schedules and offering assistance to overcome challenges were critical |
11. Cash compensation was provided for participation |
12. Participants were identified, enrolled, and consented in the field at times of day and in locations that were convenient for them |
13. Flexible, persistent, and simultaneous use of multiple strategies was critical |