. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2018 May 30;48(3):763–779. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1190-y

Table 4.

Correlations of Power Imbalance in Couples Scale (PICS) with known survey instruments used in dyadic research (95% confidence intervals)

Masculine Gender Role Stress	.21 (.09, .33)^*
Relationship Satisfaction	−.55 (−.65, −.45)^*
Commitment	−.43 (−.54, −.32)^*
Quality of Relationship Alternatives	.22 (.12, .31)^*
Internal Control	−.35 (−.42, −.27)^*
Depression	.46 (.36, .56)^*
Mutual Constructive Communication	−.66 (−.72, −.60)^*
Mutual Avoidance and Withholding	.46 (.37, .56)^*
Dyadic Trust	−.60 (−.68, −.52)^*
Anxiety	.34 (.22, .47)^*
Conceptions of Masculinity: As Physical Appearance	.05 (−.07, .17)
Conceptions of Masculinity: As Sexual Behavior	.14 (.05, .23)^*
Conceptions of Masculinity: As Social Behavior	.35 (.25, .45)^*
Social Dominance Orientation	.01 (−.16, .18)
Lifetime Discrimination	.13 (.01, .24)^*
Outness	−.22 (−.35, −.10)^*
Internalized Homophobia	.42 (.30, .55)^*

Notes: N = 434. Correlations were estimated using full-information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation in Mplus 7.3. Confidence intervals were computed using a robust variance estimator to account for the non-independence of individual respondents nested within couples.

: Statistically significant at p < .05