Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 26;19(9):13136–13146. doi: 10.3390/molecules190913136

Table 3.

Survival times of mice treated with the four Nigerian ethnomedicinal plants and combinations of the plants with standard drugs.

Extract/Drug * Survival time as Percentage of Negative Control per Model Type
Prophylactic Chemosuppressive Curative
NC (negative control) 100.0 ± 6.3 a 100.0 ± 15.8 a 100.0 ± 8.2 a,b
Nauclea latifolia (root) 312.5 ± 66.1 b,c,d 115.8 ± 19.3 a 195.5 ± 4.6 b
Nauclea latifolia (root) + PC 437.5 ± 0.0 d 184.2 ± 0.0 a 181.1 ± 27.2 b
Arthocarpus altilis (stem bark) 287.5 ± 54.7 b,c,d 100.0 ± 29.8 a 69.1 ± 30.0 a
Arthocarpus altilis (stem bark) + PC 437.5 ± 0.0 d 143.9 ± 37.7 a 94.6 ± 5.5 a,b
Murraya koenigii (leaf) 212.5 ± 60.9 a,b 119.3 ± 34.2 a 160.0 ± 18.2 a,b
Murraya koenigii (leaf) + PC 290.6 ± 54.7 b,c,d 115.8 ± 10.5 a 170.0 ± 0.9 a,b
Enantia chlorantha (stem bark) 240.6 ± 48.4 a,b,c 98.3 ± 21.9 a 67.3 ± 20.0 a
Enantia chlorantha (stem bark) + PC 396.9 ± 40.6 c,d 157.9 ± 53.5 a 168.2 ± 50.9 a,b
PC (positive controls) 437.5 ± 0.0 d 184.2 ± 0.0 a 163.6 ± 27.3 a,b

Keys: Data show the mean ± SEM, n = 5. *: Doses of the extracts given were those that gave 50% activity; NC (negative control): Tween 80 in normal saline; PC (positive controls): Pyrimethamine (1.2 mg/kg) for prophylactic, and Chloroquine (10 mg/kg) for chemosuppressive and curative models. a, b, c, d: Values with different superscripts within columns are significantly different (p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls’ test).