Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 9;183:150–172. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.003

Figure 9: — Shown for a test data set in the Pediatric Cohort are the (a) manual delineation, and the results for each of the methods: (b) LiviaNET; (c) CERES2; (d) DeepNet; (e) ConvNet; (f) RASCAL; (g) C-SUIT; (h) FS-SUIT; and (i) SUIT, for the same coronal slice shown in Fig. 3. The methods are ranked based on their mean whole cerebellum parcellation (see Fig. 10 for details).

Inline graphic — Shown for a test data set in the Pediatric Cohort are the (a) manual delineation, and the results for each of the methods: (b) LiviaNET; (c) CERES2; (d) DeepNet; (e) ConvNet; (f) RASCAL; (g) C-SUIT; (h) FS-SUIT; and (i) SUIT, for the same coronal slice shown in Fig. 3. The methods are ranked based on their mean whole cerebellum parcellation (see Fig. 10 for details).