Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 3;19(11):17810–17828. doi: 10.3390/molecules191117810

Table 1.

Data derived from light response curves for red versus green leaves measured during winters of 2011–2013. Data are means derived during winter at West End (WE) and Railroad (RR) field sites, using either red/blue LED as a light source, or ambient sunlight. Data include: dark respiration rate (DR), light compensation point (LCP), quantum yield efficiency (QYE), and photosynthesis under saturating irradiance (Asat). Asterisks denote statistical significance between means (±SE) of red and green leaves at each site (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

Red/Blue LED
n DR (μmol·m−2·s−1) LCP (μmol·m−2·s−1) QYE Asat (μmol·m−2·s−1)
Red WE 10 −0.603 ± 0.27 14.7 ± 8.9 0.0350 ± 0.0056 ** 7.88 ± 1.7 **
Green WE 12 −0.870 ± 0.39 15.6 ± 8.0 0.0442 ± 0.0076 11.1 ± 2.4
Red RR 9 −0.697 ± 0.76 18.0 ± 20 0.0362 ± 0.0080 * 11.4 ± 2.1 **
Green RR 9 −1.03 ± 0.83 18.9 ± 15 0.0504 ± 0.013 16.4 ± 3.7
Red AVG 19 −0.648 ± 0.55 16.3 ± 15 0.0356 ± 0.0067 *** 9.53 ± 2.6 ****
Green AVG 21 −0.939 ± 0.61 17.0 ± 11 0.0469 ± 0.010 13.4 ± 4.0
Ambient Sunlight
Red WE 10 −1.12 ± 0.71 49.6 ± 39 0.0255 ± 0.0094 ** 8.74 ± 2.4 *
Green WE 9 −1.20 ± 0.82 26.7 ± 23 0.0502 ± 0.023 11.0 ± 1.7
Red RR 10 −1.04 ± 0.52 41.9 ± 25 0.0241 ± 0.0045 **** 8.96 ± 1.4 ***
Green RR 13 −1.28 ± 0.36 29.8 ± 9.0 0.0398 ± 0.0049 12.4 ± 2.7
Red AVG 20 −1.08 ± 0.60 45.8 ± 32 * 0.0248 ± 0.0072 **** 8.85 ± 1.9 ****
Green AVG 22 −1.24 ± 0.57 28.6 ± 16 0.0440 ± 0.015 11.8 ± 2.4