Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;109(12):3910–3920. doi: 10.1111/cas.13824

Table 2.

Association between regulatory factors of Mieap expression and subtypes

Case Mieap methylated NIX methylated BNIP3 methylated p53 mutation Mieap expression Subtype
1 + Luminal B
4 + Luminal B
15 + Luminal B
28 + Luminal B
39 + Luminal B
55 + Luminal B
10 Deletion in exon 4 Triple negative
32 Deletion in exon 4 Triple negative
35 Deletion in exon 7 Triple negative
42 TGC→TGG(176C→W) + Triple negative
52 CGT→TGT (273R→C) Luminal B
56 GAC→CAC (281D→H) NE HER2
13 + Luminal A
33 + Triple negative
40 + Luminal B
44 + Luminal A
49 + Luminal B
50 + Luminal B
2 Luminal A
6 HER2
11 Luminal/HER2
12 NE Luminal/HER2
16 Luminal A
17 Luminal A
18 Luminal B
19 Luminal A
20 Luminal A
22 Luminal A
23 Luminal B
24 Luminal A
25 Luminal A
26 Luminal B
27 Luminal B
29 NE Luminal B
30 Luminal A
31 Luminal A
34 NE Luminal A
37 Triple negative
38 Luminal A
41 Luminal B
43 Triple negative
46 Luminal A
47 Luminal A
48 NE Luminal A
53 Luminal B
54 Luminal A
6/46 (13%) 0/46 (0%) 0/46 (0%) 6/46 (13%) 7/41 (17%)

NE, not examined.

Results of MSP for Mieap/NIX/BNIP3 promoters and p53‐mutation search (exons 4‐8) are summarized. Methylation of the Mieap promoter was positive in 6/46 (13%) cases, whereas NIX/BNIP3 promoters were negative. Genetic alterations in p53 were detected in 6/46 (13%) cases. Finally, inactivation of the p53/Mieap/NIX/BNIP3‐regulated mitochondrial quality control (MQC) pathway was observed in 12/46 (26.1%) cases. These cases were aggressive phenotypes such as Luminal B, triple negative and HER2‐enriched. Among them, ten cases of 11 subjected to IHC lost Mieap expression.