Table 2.
Average Friedman’s rankings with Holm’s adjusted p-values (α = 0.05) of the compared algorithms (SMPSO, GDE3, MOEA/D, SMS-EMOA, ssNSGA-II and NSGA-II) for the test set of 11 docking instances.
| Hyper-Volume (IHV ) | Epsilon (Iɛ+) | Metrics’ Hits | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Algorithm | FriRank | HolmAp | Algorithm | FriRank | HolmAp | Algorithm | Ranking |
| GDE3 * | 1.81 | - | SMPSO * | 1.45 | - | SMPSO | (2 + 1 = 3) |
| SMPSO | 2.18 | 6.48×10−1 | MOEA/D | 2.27 | 3.05×10−1 | GDE3 | (1 + 3 = 4) |
| MOEA/D | 2.63 | 6.10×10−1 | GDE3 | 2.72 | 2.21×10−1 | MOEA/D | (3 + 2 = 5) |
| SMS-EMOA | 4.50 | 2.32×10−3 | NSGA-II | 4.50 | 4.04×10−4 | NSGA-II | (5 + 4 = 9) |
| NSGA-II | 4.63 | 1.64×10−3 | SMS-EMOA | 4.63 | 2.65×10−4 | SMS-EMOA | (6 + 5 = 11) |
| ssNSGA-II | 5.22 | 9.62×10−5 | ssNSGA-II | 5.40 | 3.57×10−5 | ssNSGA-II | (6 + 6 = 12) |
*
indicates the control algorithm, and the column at the right contains the overall ranking of positions with regards to IHV and Iɛ+.