Table 1.
Comparison of the performances of some different THC detection methods.
| Detection Method | Linear Range | LOD | Detection Time | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-StepTM-ELISA | 0.1–6.5 ng/mg | 0.1 ng/mg | ≈2 h | [31] |
| LUCIO®-Direct-ELISA | ≥10 ng/mL | 2.5 ng/mL | ≈2 h | [32] |
| LC-ESI-MS3 | 0.13–15.75 pg/mg | 0.05 pg/mg | [33] | |
| GC-MS | 0.16–2.3 ng/mg | 0.1 ng/mg | >1 h | [34] |
| HPLC-UV | 10–104 ng/mL | 10 ng/mL | >20 min | [35] |
| Microwave-Accelerated Derivatization and GC-MS | 5–100 ng/mL | 5 ng/mL | ≈30 min | [36] |
| Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry Microchip Sensor (FAIMS) |
6.5–40 ng/mg | 6.5 ng/mg | [37] | |
| On-Line Stacking Capillary Electrophoresis | 0.04–6 µg/ml | 10 ng/mL | [38] | |
| Electrochemical Nano Immunosensor | 0.01–103 ng/mL | 3.3 pg/ml | ≈10 min | This work |