Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2018 Nov 18;19(11):3635. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113635

A Proteomic Approach for Understanding the Mechanisms of Delayed Corneal Wound Healing in Diabetic Keratopathy Using Diabetic Model Rat

Tetsushi Yamamoto 1, Hiroko Otake 1, Noriko Hiramatsu 2, Naoki Yamamoto 2, Atsushi Taga 1, Noriaki Nagai 1,*
PMCID: PMC6274742  PMID: 30453691

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a widespread metabolic disorder, and long-term hyperglycemia in diabetics leads to diabetic keratopathy. In the present study, we used a shotgun liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry-based global proteomic approach using the cornea of streptozotocin-induced diabetic (STZ) rats to examine the mechanisms of delayed corneal wound healing in diabetic keratopathy. Applying a label-free quantitation method based on spectral counting, we identified 188 proteins that showed expression changes of >2.0-fold in the cornea of STZ rats. In particular, the level of lumican expression in the cornea of STZ rats was higher than that of the normal rats. In the cornea of the normal rat, the expression level of lumican was elevated during the wound healing process, and it returned to the same expression level as before cornea injury after the wound was healed completely. On the other hand, a high expression level of lumican in the cornea of STZ rats was still maintained even after the wound was healed completely. In addition, adhesion deficiency in corneal basal cells and Bowman’s membrane was observed in the STZ rat. Thus, abnormally overexpressed lumican may lead to adhesion deficiency in the cornea of STZ rats.

Keywords: lumican, diabetic keratopathy, shotgun proteomics, corneal wound healing streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a widespread metabolic disorder. The world prevalence of DM among adults (aged 20 to 79 years old) in 2010 was 6.4% (285 million adults), and will increase to 7.7% (439 million adults) by 2030 [1]. DM is characterized by insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion [2], and the resulting long-term hyperglycemia in diabetics leads to many ophthalmic complications, including retinopathy, cataracts, uveitis, and keratopathy [3]. Patients with ophthalmic complications caused by DM may develop impaired vision or blindness. Diabetic keratopathy shows relatively few symptoms compared with other ophthalmic complications of DM; however, once the cornea is damaged, delayed corneal wound healing is often observed [4]. The delayed corneal wound healing in diabetic keratopathy is caused by changes in the structure and function of the corneal epithelium and the corneal epithelial basement membrane at the time of healing [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. During corneal wound healing, various specific proteins are upregulated, such as vinculin [16], keratins [17], CD44 hyaluronan receptors [18], gelatinases, and metalloproteinase inhibitors [19,20]. Changes in the expression of these proteins are key factors in the process of corneal wound healing in diabetic keratopathy due to the modulation of cell adhesion or migration in the cornea. In addition, the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the cornea (consisting of glycoproteins and proteoglycan) is essential for the maintenance of corneal transparency, and changes in the proteoglycan content of the cornea may result in corneal opacity [21,22,23]. In particular, lumican, is a member of the class II small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) family [24,25] and is considered as one of the key factors in the corneal wound healing process. Saika et al. reported that lumican has the characteristic of modulating the corneal wound healing of epithelial defects which is consistent with an emerging body of data showing that SLRP proteins not only serve as regulators of collagenous extracellular matrix assembly, but also have biological roles involving direct interactions with cells [26]. In addition, Chakravarti et al. reported that mice lacking lumican show age-dependent corneal opacity and a high proportion of abnormally thick collagen fibers in the corneal stroma [27]. Therefore, changes in the constituents of ECM including lumican are also an important factor during corneal wound healing in diabetic keratopathy because of the need to maintain the normal structure of the cornea. On the other hand, not all of the underlying mechanisms for diabetic keratopathy have been revealed, and further investigations are required.

A proteomic approach is used to examine the mechanisms of cell behavior including cornea tissue engineering [28]. In particular, a shotgun liquid chromatography (LC)/mass spectrometry (MS)-based global proteomic analysis method is considered a useful technique [23,29,30]. As we reported previously, changes in protein expression levels in the lenses of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat (STZ rats) were evaluated using this methodology, and revealed a decrease in superoxide dismutase in the lenses of STZ rats which contributed to the progression of diabetic cataracts [31]. The analysis may be used to elucidate the causal factor of diabetic keratopathy. In the present study, we performed a shotgun proteomic analysis of the cornea of STZ rats to examine the mechanisms of delayed corneal wound healing in diabetic keratopathy. We further investigated whether any of these proteins might be involved in corneal wound healing in STZ rats.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Semiquantitative Comparisons of Differentially Expressed Proteins in the Cornea of Normal and STZ Rats

To investigate mechanisms of diabetic keratopathy, we used shotgun proteomics to examine the molecular profiles of proteins that were regulated in the cornea of the diabetic rat model. Applying our search parameters, we identified 276 proteins in the cornea of the normal rat (Normal), and 260 proteins in the cornea of the STZ rat (STZ) (Figure 1). A total of 403 proteins were identified from the cornea of the rat, of which 133 (33.0%) were present in both Normal and STZ, 143 (35.5%) were unique to Normal, and 127 (31.5%) were unique to STZ (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A Venn map of proteins identified from the cornea of normal and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. We identified 276 proteins in the cornea of normal rats (Normal) and 260 proteins in cornea of STZ-induced diabetic rats (STZ).

Furthermore, we evaluated the proteins expressed in the cornea of rats using a label-free semiquantitative method based on spectral counting. Figure 2 shows the Rsc values for the proteins identified in the Normal and STZ groups. A positive Rsc value indicated increased expression in the cornea of diabetic rat, and a negative value indicated reduced expression in the cornea of diabetic rat (light gray area). In addition, the normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) value for each protein identified in the Normal and STZ groups was also calculated. Proteins with a high positive or negative Rsc value were considered candidate proteins that were regulated in the cornea of diabetic rat. Table 1 shows the proteins differentially expressed (≥2-fold) in the cornea between normal and STZ rats, and this semiquantitative procedure resulted in the identification of 188 proteins that were differentially expressed in the cornea of the diabetic rat (Supplementary Table S1). The expression levels of housekeeping proteins, such as β-actin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and histone H4 did not change in the cornea of the normal and STZ rats (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Semiquantitative comparison of proteins differentially expressed in the cornea of the STZ rat. For the identified proteins, Rsc and normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) values were calculated to compare protein expression levels between the cornea of normal rat (Normal) and that of the STZ rat (STZ). Proteins are positioned along the x-axis according to Rsc value, increasing from left to right (light gray area). NSAF values are shown for the Normal group (below the axis; gray bar) and for the STZ group (above the axis; black bar). Proteins highly expressed in the Normal and STZ groups are near the left and right sides, respectively of the x-axis. Housekeeping proteins are located around the center of the x-axis.

Table 1.

Proteins categorized as “extracellular matrix” in Gene Ontology analysis.

No. Accession Number and Description Fold Change (Rsc)
1 P30427 Plectin −2.277
2 P69897 Tubulin beta-5 chain −2.154
3 Q6P9T8 Tubulin beta-4B chain −2.062
4 P05197 Elongation factor 2 −2.062
5 P61980 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K −1.505
6 P61751 ADP-ribosylation factor 4 −1.505
7 P62271 40S ribosomal protein S18 −1.117
8 P45592 Cofilin-1 −1.117
9 P49744 Thrombospondin-4 1.111
10 P02466 Collagen alpha-2(I) chain 1.111
11 Q8CJD3 Zymogen granule membrane protein 16 1.111
12 P51886 Lumican 1.459
13 Q9EQP5 Prolargin 1.488
14 P47853 Biglycan 1.740
15 Q01129 Decorin 2.0601
Open in a new tab

2.2. Functional Annotation of Proteins Regulated by Hyperglycemia

We performed a Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the candidate proteins that were regulated in the cornea of diabetic rat. We searched for GO terms related to the “cellular component” (Figure 3), to “molecular function” (Figure S1), to “biological processes” (Figure S2) and “Pathway” (Figure S3) in Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID), and focused on the 15 proteins classified as “extracellular matrix”—which plays important roles in cornea wound healing-in GO cellular component terms (Table 1). Among the 15 proteins, we focused on the effect of enhanced expression of lumican in the cornea of STZ since lumican is a one of the key factors in the wound healing process of the cornea.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of identified proteins. Differentially expressed proteins were assigned to GO term categories related to cellular components, and only significant categories are shown (p < 0.05).

Fifteen proteins were differentially expressed in the cornea of STZ rat, and were classified as extracellular matrix proteins by gene ontology analysis.

2.3. Effects of Hyperglycemia on Lumican Expression in Cornea of Rat

We examined the expression level of lumican protein in the cornea of STZ rat and normal rat to validate the results of the proteomic analysis. Based on its amino acid sequence, lumican has four potential sites for N-linked glycosylation [32,33], and lumican has forms with various molecular weights for different glycosylation patterns [34]. In the cornea, lumican is expressed as the keratin sulfate proteoglycan, and is considered to possess the heterogeneous glycosaminoglycan [32,35]. Previously, various molecular weights of lumican between 37 and 250 kDa due to differences in glycosylation were detected from cell extracts by Western blot [36,37,38,39,40]. Our results also showed that various molecular weights of lumican between 37 and 250 kDa were observed in the cornea of rat, and increased lumican expression was observed in the cornea of the STZ rat (STZ) as compared to in that of the normal rat (Normal) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Lumican expression in the cornea of STZ rat. The lumican expression level in the cornea of STZ rats was higher than in that of the normal rats.

2.4. Changes in Expression of Lumican during Corneal Wound Healing in STZ Rats

We previously measured the corneal wound healing rate in normal rats with corneal epithelial abrasion [41] and observed changes in cell migration and cell proliferation in the corneal epithelium was observed 6–12 h and 18–25 h after corneal epithelial abrasion [41]. We thus determined the measurement points (14 h and 24 h after corneal epithelial abrasion) to evaluate the expression of lumican during corneal wound healing in STZ rats. The corneal wounds were almost completely healed at 25 h, and corneal wound healing was similar for both normal and STZ rats at all the tested time points after corneal epithelial abrasion as measured using fluorescein and a TRC-50X. No differences in wounds in the corneal surface were evident with fluorescein (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The corneal wound healing of normal and STZ rats after corneal epithelial abrasion. The corneal wound healing values (%) were calculated according to Equation 3. The data are presented as means ± S.E. of 5–10 rats.

On the other hand, adhesion deficiency in the corneal basal cells and Bowman’s membrane of STZ rats was observed as compared to in those of normal rats based on histopathological analysis by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining (Figure 6, arrowheads).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the cornea in normal and STZ rats 25 h after corneal wound abrasion. (A) Corneal epithelial image of normal rats. (B) Corneal epithelial image of STZ rats. Arrow (▲) shows adhesion deficiency between corneal basal cells and Bowman’s membrane.

We then examined the changes in expression of lumican protein in the cornea of normal and STZ rats during the wound healing process. In the cornea of normal rats, the expression of lumican at 14 h increased whereas by 25 h it had returned to the same level as that before abrasion of the corneal epithelium (Figure 7, Normal). The expression of lumican at 14 h also increased in the cornea of STZ rats; however, by 25 h, its expression was still elevated as compared to that before abrasion of the corneal epithelium (Figure 7, STZ).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Changes in expression of lumican during the corneal wound healing process. The expression of lumican increased at 14 h in both normal and STZ rats. The high expression level of lumican was still observed in the cornea of STZ rats 25 h after corneal abrasion. β-actin was used as control.

3. Discussion

In a study to elucidate the mechanism of diabetic keratopathy, the selection of the model animal is important. STZ damages pancreatic β-cells in rats, leading to deficient insulin secretion [42,43]. The continuous hyperglycemia state of the STZ rat tends to cause corneal wounds. Therefore, STZ rats have been widely used as a normal diabetic keratopathy model [44]. First, we examined the plasma of STZ rats to investigate the glucose and insulin levels in STZ rat plasma. The plasma glucose levels of STZ rats were significantly higher than those of the normal rats (normal: 82.1 ± 4.0 mg/dL, STZ: 252 ± 9.7 mg/dL, n = 8). Furthermore, the plasma insulin level of STZ rats was not detected and the body weight was significantly decreased compared with that of the normal rats (normal: 319.6 ± 9.1 g, STZ: 216.8 ± 11.0 g, n = 8). These results showed that the STZ rats developed diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and hypoinsulinemia.

In this study, LC/MS-based proteomics analysis was used to elucidate the mechanism of the delay in corneal wound healing in diabetic keratopathy using this diabetic model rat. Although a quantitative value obtained using spectral counting may not be accurate, this value well reflects differences in expression level and has been used in previous studies investigating novel diagnostic biomarkers [29,45,46,47,48]. A total of 188 proteins that showed >2-fold changes in expression were successfully identified in the cornea of the STZ rat (Table 1). We examined the roles of these identified proteins with GO analysis, and then focused on the functions of proteins classified as “extracellular matrix” since these proteins play important roles in supporting wound healing processes. We also focused on lumican, which is a member of this category. Then, we performed Western blot analysis to validate our spectral counting results, and determine whether hyperglycemia led to increased lumican expression in the cornea of rats (Figure 4).

Lumican is a secreted collagen-binding ECM protein of the corneal, dermis, and tendon stroma, arterial wall, and intestinal submucosa [49,50,51,52]. Lumican can interact with various cellular components such as cytokines, growth factors, and cell surface receptors to regulate cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration [24,34]. Moreover, lumican is considered an important phenotypic marker of corneal keratocytes [40,53,54]; it is transiently expressed during tissue repair in murine corneal epithelium and its absence delays epithelial wound healing in vivo [26]. Therefore, study of the lumican expression level may have therapeutic implications for corneal wound healing, and we investigated whether the abnormally overexpressed lumican in the cornea of the diabetic rat affects the corneal wound healing process. However, there was no difference in the wound healing process between normal and STZ rats (Figure 5). Based on these results, Benaouda conducted a study that showed that in the STZ rats, the corneal epithelium wound was completely covered with proliferating epithelium so as to be structurally indistinguishable from the surrounding residual epithelium [55]. However, abnormalities such as epithelial cell thickening and undulations in the Bowman membrane were observed. From this report, we considered that modulating cell behaviors, such as adhesion, migration, and proliferation balance of the STZ rat were the sources of the abnormality in the corneal epithelium wound healing process.

On the other hand, adhesion deficiency in the corneal basal cells and Bowman’s membrane was observed in the STZ rat after the wound was healed completely while there were no structural changes in the normal rat (Figure 6). Lumican is a critical ECM multifunctional effector with a role in regulating collagen assembly and angiogenesis [27,56,57]. Therefore, abnormally overexpressed lumican might lead to these structural changes in the corneas of STZ rats. In addition, the expression level of lumican in the cornea of normal rat was elevated during the wound healing process, and it returned to a level of expression similar to that before cornea injury once the wound had healed completely. A previous report also showed similar changes in the expression of lumican during the cornea wound healing process [26]. In this report, lumican appeared in the migrating epithelium at 1 day after injury, peaked at days 2 and 3, and completely disappeared by day 7 from the immunohistochemical analysis; anti-lumican antibody delayed corneal injury in cultured mouse eyes. Therefore, this expression cycle of lumican was considered to play an important role in the wound healing process. However, the high expression level of lumican in the cornea of STZ rats was still maintained even after the wound was healed completely (Figure 7). To clarify the mechanism of this maintained high expression of lumican, further studies are necessary such as immunohistochemical analysis using the corneal tissue of STZ rats during the wound healing process. In order to improve delayed wound healing in diabetic keratopathy, we considered it important to adjust this abnormally overexpressed lumican to a normal expression level.

Furthermore, expression levels of decorin, biglycan, and prolargin, which also belong to the family of SLRP, were highly expressed in the cornea of diabetic rat. In a recent study, ECM proteins including lumican, decorin, and biglycan were reported to be involved in corneal wound healing, and these agents have the biological function of modulating cell behavior, such as adhesion, migration, and proliferation [26,58,59,60]. In addition, these ECM proteins function as regulators of tissue hydration and collagen fibrillogenesis [44,61,62]. In earlier study, decorin, byglycan, and prolargin were also found to be involved in the corneal wound healing [58,60]. Therefore, further studies are necessary to investigate the correlation between the expression of other ECM proteins and the wound healing process in diabetic keratopathy. In the future, we will investigate the correlation of other components of the extracellular matrix.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

We purchased urea from GE Healthcare UK Ltd. (Buckinghamshire, UK) and thiourea and Triton X-100 from NACALAI TESQUE Inc. (Kyoto, Japan). All the other reagents and solvents used were of analytical or HPLC grade.

4.2. Animals

Healthy Male Wistar rats were provided by Kiwa Laboratory Animals Co., Ltd. (Wakayama, Japan) and the 6-week old rats were injected with STZ for 2 days (100 mg/kg/day, i.p.) (28), and housed for 2 weeks. The STZ rats with over 200 mg/dL glucose levels were used in this study. Sodium pentobarbital overdose (i.p.) was used to euthanize the rats, and the corneas were excised. The removed corneas were used for the analysis of the corneal wound healing rate (n = 15), Western blot (n = 12) and hematoxylin and Eosin staining (n = 8), and proteomics (n = 5). All of the experiments were performed in compliance with the regulations approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kindai University Faculty of Pharmacy (Ethic Committee approval code: KAPS-25-001, Date: 1 April 2013). The rats were housed in a room at 25 °C under a 12-h light–dark cycle (2–3 rats/cage). All rats had access to food and water ad libitum.

4.3. Assay of Glucose and Insulin

Blood (50 μL) was sampled without anesthesia from the tail vein of each rat after fasting for 12 h (10:00 a.m.). The plasma glucose level was measured using an Accutrend GCT (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and plasma insulin levels were assayed using an ELISA Insulin kit (cat. no. M1103; Morinaga Institute of Biological Science, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol [63]. The dynamic range of the ELISA Insulin kit is 0.1 to 6.4 ng/mL.

4.4. Tryptic Digestion of Protein Extracted from the Cornea of Normal and STZ Rats

The normal and STZ rats were euthanized by injecting sodium pentobarbital. Then, the corneas of normal and STZ rats were removed and homogenized in urea lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 5% CHAPS, and 1% Triton X-100). The protein concentration was measured using a Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (cat. no. 5000006JA;Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Then, a gel-free trypsin treatment was performed in accordance with the protocol described by Bluemlein and Ralser [64]. Briefly, 10 μg of protein extract from each sample was reduced at 37 °C for 30 min by the addition of 45 mM dithiothreitol and 20 mM tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer. The proteins were then alkylated with 100 mM iodoacetic acid in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. After alkylation, the samples were digested at 37 °C for 24 h using mass spectrometry grade trypsin gold (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) at a trypsin/protein ratio of 1:100 (w:w). Finally, the digests were purified using PepClean C-18 Spin Columns (cat. no. 89870; Thermo, Rockford, IL, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

4.5. LC-MS/MS Analysis for Protein Identification

Peptide samples (~2 μg) were injected into a peptide L-trap column (Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan) with an HTC PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). They were then further separated through a Paradigm MS4 (AMR Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with a reverse-phase C18-column (L-column, 3-μm-diameter gel particles, 120 Å pore size, 0.2 × 150 mm; Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute). The column flow rate was 1 μL/min, and the mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (solution A) and acetonitrile (solution B), with a concentration gradient of 5% solution B to 40% solution B over 120 min. Gradient-eluted peptides were analyzed with an LTQ ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo). The results were acquired in a data-dependent manner, with MS/MS fragmentation performed on the two most intense peaks of every full MS scan with an isolation width of m/z 1.0 and a collisional activation amplitude of 35% in the m/z rage of 300 to 2000. All MS/MS spectral data were searched against the SwissProt Rattus database using Mascot version 2.4.01 (Matrix Science, London, UK). The search criteria were enzyme as trypsin, with the following allowances: ≤2 missed cleavage peptides; mass tolerance, ±2.0 Da; MS/MS tolerance, ±0.8 Da; cysteine carbamidomethylation for fixed modification; and methionine oxidation modifications for variable modification.

4.6. Semiquantitative Analysis of Identified Proteins

The fold change in expression was calculated as the log2 of the ratio of protein abundances (Rsc) evaluated by spectral counting [65]. Rsc was calculated using the following equation.

Rsc = log2[(ns + f)/(nn + f)] + log2[(tn − nn + f)/(ts − ns + f)] (1)

Here, nn and ns are spectral counts for the protein in the cornea of normal rat and STZ rat, respectively, tn and ts are total numbers of spectra over all proteins in the two samples, and ƒ is a correction factor set to 1.25.

For comparison, we calculated the relative amounts of identified proteins using the normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) [66]. NSAF was calculated using the following equation.

NSAF = (SpCn/Ln)/SUM(SpCn/Ln) (2)

Here, SpCn is the spectral count for the protein in the cornea of normal rat or STZ rat, and Ln is the length of the protein in the cornea of normal rat or STZ rat.

Differentially expressed proteins were selected when the Rsc was >1 or <−1, which corresponded to fold changes of >2 or <0.5.

4.7. Bioinformatics

We additionally investigated the functions of proteins that showed significantly altered expression with diabetes mellitus. Their sequences were processed by examining their functional annotations in the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) version 6.8 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) [67,68,69].

4.8. Western Blot Analysis

An aliquot of cell extract (10 µg) was added to each well, and subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The separated proteins were then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes for 30 min at 15 V. After blocking in TBS-Tween-20 (0.1%) buffer with 5% skim milk for 2 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated at 4 °C overnight with an anti-lumican antibody (1:1000; cat. no. MAB2846; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Next, the membranes were washed and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (cat. no. A102PU; American Qualex, San Clemente, CA, USA). The blots were washed and visualized using SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA), with band detection using the myECL Imager system (version 2.0; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Finally, the same membranes were re-probed using an anti-β-actin antibody (cat. no. sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), which served as the protein loading control. All Western blots were performed in three independent experiments.

4.9. In Vivo Wound Healing of the Corneal Epithelium of the Rats

The abrasion of the corneal epithelium in the normal and STZ rats was performed as described previously [41,55,70,71,72,73]. The rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg, i.p.), and a 3.0 mm diameter circle was outlined in the center of the cornea with a disposable dermatological skin punch (BIOPSY PUNCH, Kai Industries Co., Ltd., Gifu, Japan). The encircled corneal epithelia were removed with a BD Micro-SharpTM (blade 3.5 mm, 30°, Becton Dickinson, Fukushima, Japan). The corneal area, from which the epithelium was removed, was dyed by instilling a solution containing 1% fluorescein (Alcon, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.4% Benoxil (Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) [74]. Changes in the corneal wound area were monitored using a TRC-50X (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera (EOS Kiss Digital N, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) [41] 6 h and 25 h after the corneal epithelial abrasion; the wound area was analyzed with image analyzing software Image J. Corneal wound healing (%) was calculated using the following equation.

Corneal wound healing (%) = (wound area0 h − wound area25 h)/wound area0 h × 100 (3)

4.10. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of the Cornea

Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of the cornea in the normal and STZ rats was prepared as described previously [44,75,76]. The rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg, i.p.) and the eyes were removed. The removed eyes were fixed in SUPER FIXTM rapid fixative solution (cat. no. KY-500; Kurabo Industries, Osaka, Japan), and 3-μm paraffin sections were prepared and stained with H.E. A microscope (Power BX-51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used for observation of the corneal tissue.

4.11. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard error of measurement (SEM). Statistical comparisons were made with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparisons of means were performed using Student’s t-test (two tail), and the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In this study, shotgun LC/MS-based global proteomic analysis revealed that a higher expression level of lumican was induced in the cornea of STZ rats, and structural changes in the cornea were observed in the STZ rats after abrasion of the corneal epithelium. Therefore, regulating the lumican expression may reduce the delay in wound healing in diabetic keratopathy and may serve an important role in therapeutic approaches to diabetic keratopathy.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the MEXT-Supported Program of the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (2014–2018) (S1411037).

Abbreviations

DM Diabetes mellitus
ECM Extracellular matrix
GO Gene ontology
LC/MS Liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy
NSAF Normalized spectral abundance factor
SLRP Small leucine-rich proteoglycan
STZ Streptozotocin
Open in a new tab

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/11/3635/s1.

Click here for additional data file. (141.2KB, zip)

Author Contributions

T.Y. and N.N. conceived of and designed the study; T.Y., O.H., and N.N. wrote the manuscript; T.Y. and A.T. performed proteomics and Western blot analysis; O.H. and N.N. performed the in vivo experiments using rats and analyzed the data; N.H. and N.Y. performed the histological analysis of rats. All authors significantly contributed to the conception and design of the study and to the interpretation of the data.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Shaw J.E., Sicree R.A., Zimmet P.Z. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2010;87:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:S5–S20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature. 2001;414:813–820. doi: 10.1038/414813a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chikama T., Wakuta M., Liu Y., Nishida T. Deviated mechanism of wound healing in diabetic corneas. Cornea. 2007;26:S75–S81. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f6d8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Friend J., Ishii Y., Thoft R.A. Corneal epithelial changes in diabetic rats. Ophthalmic Res. 1982;14:269–278. doi: 10.1159/000265202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Azar D.T., Spurr-Michaud S.J., Tisdale A.S., Gipson I.K. Altered epithelial-basement membrane interactions in diabetic corneas. Arch. Ophth. 1992;110:537–540. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080160115045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McDermott A.M., Xiao T.L., Kern T.S., Murphy C.J. Non-enzymatic glycation in corneas from normal and diabetic donors and its effects on epithelial cell attachment in vitro. Optometry. 2003;74:443–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ljubimov A.V., Alba S.A., Burgeson R.E., Ninomiya Y., Sado Y., Sun T.T., Nesburn A.B., Kenney M.C., Maguen E. Extracellular matrix changes in human corneas after radial keratotomy. Exp. Eye Res. 1998;67:265–272. doi: 10.1006/exer.1998.0511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kabosova A., Kramerov A.A., Aoki A.M., Murphy G., Zieske J.D., Ljubimov A.V. Human diabetic corneas preserve wound healing, basement membrane, integrin and MMP-10 differences from normal corneas in organ culture. Exp. Eye Res. 2003;77:211–217. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4835(03)00111-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zagon I.S., Sassani J.W., McLaughlin P.J. Insulin treatment ameliorates impaired corneal reepithelialization in diabetic rats. Diabetes. 2006;55:1141–1147. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wakuta M., Morishige N., Chikama T., Seki K., Nagano T., Nishida T. Delayed wound closure and phenotypic changes in corneal epithelium of the spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rat. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci. 2007;48:590–596. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Inoue K., Okugawa K., Amano S., Oshika T., Takamura E., Egami F., Umizu G., Aikawa K., Kato S. Blinking and superficial punctate keratopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eye (Lond) 2005;19:418–421. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rehany U., Ishii Y., Lahav M., Rumelt S. Ultrastructural changes in corneas of diabetic patients: An electron-microscopy study. Cornea. 2000;19:534–538. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200007000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saini J.S., Khandalavla B. Corneal epithelial fragility in diabetes mellitus. Can. J. Ophth. 1995;30:142–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schultz R.O., Van Horn D.L., Peters M.A., Klewin K.M., Schutten W.H. Diabetic keratopathy. Trans. Am. Ophthal. Soc. 1981;79:180–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zieske J.D., Bukusoglu G., Gipson I.K. Enhancement of vinculin synthesis by migrating stratified squamous epithelium. J. Cell Biol. 1989;109:571–576. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu F.X., Gipson I.K., Guo Y. Differential gene expression in healing rat corneal epithelium. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci. 1995;36:1997–2007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu F.X., Guo J., Zhang Q. Expression and distribution of adhesion molecule CD44 in healing corneal epithelia. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci. 1998;39:710–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Inoue M., Kratz G., Haegerstrand A., Stahle-Backdahl M. Collagenase expression is rapidly induced in wound-edge keratinocytes after acute injury in human skin, persists during healing, and stops at re-epithelialization. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1995;104:479–483. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12605917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saarialho-Kere U.K., Kovacs S.O., Pentland A.P., Olerud J.E., Welgus H.G., Parks W.C. Cell-matrix interactions modulate interstitial collagenase expression by human keratinocytes actively involved in wound healing. J. Clin. Invest. 1993;92:2858–2866. doi: 10.1172/JCI116906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hassell J.R., Newsome D.A., Krachmer J.H., Rodrigues M.M. Macular corneal dystrophy: Failure to synthesize a mature keratan sulfate proteoglycan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1980;77:3705–3709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dunlevy J.R., Chakravarti S., Gyalzen P., Vergnes J.P., Hassell J.R. Cloning and chromosomal localization of mouse keratocan, a corneal keratan sulfate proteoglycan. Mamm. Genome. 1998;9:316–319. doi: 10.1007/s003359900757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joseph R., Srivastava O.P., Pfister R.R. Differential epithelial and stromal protein profiles in keratoconus and normal human corneas. Exp. Eye Res. 2011;92:282–298. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nikitovic D., Katonis P., Tsatsakis A., Karamanos N.K., Tzanakakis G.N. Lumican, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan. IUBMB Life. 2008;60:818–823. doi: 10.1002/iub.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iozzo R.V. Matrix proteoglycans: From molecular design to cellular function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998;67:609–652. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saika S., Shiraishi A., Liu C.Y., Funderburgh J.L., Kao C.W., Converse R.L., Kao W.W. Role of lumican in the corneal epithelium during wound healing. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:2607–2612. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chakravarti S., Magnuson T., Lass J.H., Jepsen K.J., LaMantia C., Carroll H. Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: Skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J. Cell Biol. 1998;141:1277–1286. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ma D.H., Lai J.Y., Yu S.T., Liu J.Y., Yang U., Chen H.C., Yeh L.K., Ho Y.J., Chang G., Wang S.F., et al. Up-regulation of heat shock protein 70-1 (Hsp70-1) in human limbo-corneal epithelial cells cultivated on amniotic membrane: A proteomic study. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012;227:2030–2039. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamamoto T., Kudo M., Peng W.X., Naito Z. Analysis of protein expression regulated by lumican in PANC-1 cells using shotgun proteomics. Oncol. Rep. 2013;30:1609–1621. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meade M.L., Shiyanov P., Schlager J.J. Enhanced detection method for corneal protein identification using shotgun proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2009;7:23. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-7-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nagai N., Yamamoto T., Mitamura K., Taga A. Proteomic profile of the lens in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model using shotgun proteomics. Biomed. Rep. 2017;7:445–450. doi: 10.3892/br.2017.988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grover J., Chen X.N., Korenberg J.R., Roughley P.J. The human lumican gene. Organization, chromosomal location, and expression in articular cartilage. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:21942–21949. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.37.21942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chakravarti S., Stallings R.L., SundarRaj N., Cornuet P.K., Hassell J.R. Primary structure of human lumican (keratan sulfate proteoglycan) and localization of the gene (LUM) to chromosome 12q21.3-q22. Genomics. 1995;27:481–488. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Naito Z. Role of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) family in pathological lesions and cancer cell growth. J. Nippon Med. Sch. 2005;72:137–145. doi: 10.1272/jnms.72.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Funderburgh J.L. Keratan sulfate: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Glycobiology. 2000;10:951–958. doi: 10.1093/glycob/10.10.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzuki H., Chikada M., Yokoyama M.K., Kurokawa M.S., Ando T., Furukawa H., Arito M., Miyairi T., Kato T. Aberrant Glycosylation of Lumican in Aortic Valve Stenosis Revealed by Proteomic Analysis. Int. Heart J. 2016;57:104–111. doi: 10.1536/ihj.15-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klejewski A., Sterzynska K., Wojtowicz K., Swierczewska M., Partyka M., Brazert M., Nowicki M., Zabel M., Januchowski R. The significance of lumican expression in ovarian cancer drug-resistant cell lines. Oncotarget. 2017;8:74466–74478. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Matsuda Y., Yamamoto T., Kudo M., Kawahara K., Kawamoto M., Nakajima Y., Koizumi K., Nakazawa N., Ishiwata T., Naito Z. Expression and roles of lumican in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2008;33:1177–1185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ishiwata T., Cho K., Kawahara K., Yamamoto T., Fujiwara Y., Uchida E., Tajiri T., Naito Z. Role of lumican in cancer cells and adjacent stromal tissues in human pancreatic cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2007;18:537–543. doi: 10.3892/or.18.3.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Littlechild S.L., Young R.D., Caterson B., Yoshida H., Yamazaki M., Sakimura K., Quantock A.J., Akama T.O. Keratan Sulfate Phenotype in the beta-1,3-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase-7-Null Mouse Cornea. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci. 2018;59:1641–1651. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nagai N., Murao T., Ito Y., Okamoto N., Sasaki M. Enhancing effects of sericin on corneal wound healing in rat debrided corneal epithelium. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009;32:933–936. doi: 10.1248/bpb.32.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stephen Irudayaraj S., Sunil C., Duraipandiyan V., Ignacimuthu S. Antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. leaves in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012;143:515–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nisha P., Mini S. Flavanoid rich ethyl acetate fraction of Musa paradisiaca inflorescence down-regulates the streptozotocin induced oxidative stress, hyperglycaemia and mRNA levels of selected inflammatory genes in rats. J. Funct. Foods. 2013;5:1838–1847. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nagai N., Deguchi S., Otake H., Hiramatsu N., Yamamoto N. Therapeutic Effect of Cilostazol Ophthalmic Nanodispersions on Retinal Dysfunction in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1971. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Takaya A., Peng W.X., Ishino K., Kudo M., Yamamoto T., Wada R., Takeshita T., Naito Z. Cystatin B as a potential diagnostic biomarker in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2015;46:1573–1581. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kanzaki A., Kudo M., Ansai S., Peng W.X., Ishino K., Yamamoto T., Wada R., Fuji T., Teduka K., Kawahara K., et al. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein-3 as a marker for distinguishing between cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2016;48:1007–1015. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yamamoto T., Kudo M., Peng W.X., Takata H., Takakura H., Teduka K., Fujii T., Mitamura K., Taga A., Uchida E., et al. Identification of aldolase A as a potential diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer based on proteomic analysis using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:13595–13606. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5275-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Takata H., Kudo M., Yamamoto T., Ueda J., Ishino K., Peng W.X., Wadai R., Taniai N., Yoshida H., Uchida E., et al. Increased expression of PDIA3 and its association with cancer cell proliferation and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2016;12:4896–4904. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rada J.A., Cornuet P.K., Hassell J.R. Regulation of Corneal Collagen Fibrillogenesis Invitro by Corneal Proteoglycan (Lumican and Decorin) Core Proteins. Exp. Eye Res. 1993;56:635–648. doi: 10.1006/exer.1993.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Svensson L., Narlid I., Oldberg A. Fibromodulin and lumican bind to the same region on collagen type I fibrils. FEBS Lett. 2000;470:178–182. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01314-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chakravarti S. Functions of lumican and fibromodulin: Lessons from knockout mice. Glycoconj. J. 2002;19:287–293. doi: 10.1023/A:1025348417078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vogel K.G., Paulsson M., Heinegard D. Specific inhibition of type I and type II collagen fibrillogenesis by the small proteoglycan of tendon. Biochem. J. 1984;223:587–597. doi: 10.1042/bj2230587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lai J.Y., Tu I.H. Adhesion, phenotypic expression, and biosynthetic capacity of corneal keratocytes on surfaces coated with hyaluronic acid of different molecular weights. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:1068–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu J., Du Y., Mann M.M., Funderburgh J.L., Wagner W.R. Corneal stromal stem cells versus corneal fibroblasts in generating structurally appropriate corneal stromal tissue. Exp. Eye Res. 2014;120:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bendimerad B. Wound Healing in Partial Denudation of Corneal Epithelium of Diabetic Rat. Kitasato Med. 1987;17:179–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vij N., Roberts L., Joyce S., Chakravarti S. Lumican regulates corneal inflammatory responses by modulating Fas-Fas ligand signaling. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci. 2005;46:88–95. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Albig A.R., Roy T.G., Becenti D.J., Schiemann W.P. Transcriptome analysis of endothelial cell gene expression induced by growth on matrigel matrices: Identification and characterization of MAGP-2 and lumican as novel regulators of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2007;10:197–216. doi: 10.1007/s10456-007-9075-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Iozzo R.V., Moscatello D.K., McQuillan D.J., Eichstetter I. Decorin is a biological ligand for the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:4489–4492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.4489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Moscatello D.K., Santra M., Mann D.M., McQuillan D.J., Wong A.J., Iozzo R.V. Decorin suppresses tumor cell growth by activating the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;101:406–412. doi: 10.1172/JCI846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Podskochy A., Koulikovska M., Fagerholm P., van der Ploeg I. Biglycan gene expression in UVR-exposed rabbit corneas. Acta Ophthalmol. Scan. 2004;82:200–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2004.00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ivorra M.D., Paya M., Villar A. A Review of Natural-Products and Plants as Potential Antidiabetic Drugs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1989;27:243–275. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(89)90001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Arumugam S., Sreedhar R., Miyashita S., Karuppagounder V., Thandavarayan R.A., Giridharan V.V., Pitchaimani V., Afrin R., Harima M., Suzuki K., et al. Comparative evaluation of torasemide and furosemide on rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2014;97:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nagai N., Ito Y., Sasaki H. Hyperglycemia Enhances the Production of Amyloid beta1-42 in the Lenses of Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty Rats, a Model of Human Type 2 Diabetes. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:1408–1417. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-19026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bluemlein K., Ralser M. Monitoring protein expression in whole-cell extracts by targeted label- and standard-free LC-MS/MS. Nat. Protoc. 2011;6:859–869. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Old W.M., Meyer-Arendt K., Aveline-Wolf L., Pierce K.G., Mendoza A., Sevinsky J.R., Resing K.A., Ahn N.G. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2005;4:1487–1502. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500084-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zybailov B., Coleman M.K., Florens L., Washburn M.P. Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:6218–6224. doi: 10.1021/ac050846r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dennis G., Jr., Sherman B.T., Hosack D.A., Yang J., Gao W., Lane H.C., Lempicki R.A. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Zheng X., Yang J., Imamichi T., Stephens R., Lempicki R.A. Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Curr. Protoc. Bioinf. 2009;27:13.11.1–13.11.13. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1311s27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nagai N., Fukuoka Y., Ishii M., Otake H., Yamamoto T., Taga A., Okamoto N., Shimomura Y. Instillation of Sericin Enhances Corneal Wound Healing through the ERK Pathway in Rat Debrided Corneal Epithelium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1123. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nagai N., Ito Y., Okamoto N., Shimomura Y. Size effect of rebamipide ophthalmic nanodispersions on its therapeutic efficacy for corneal wound healing. Exp. Eye Res. 2016;151:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nagai N., Ogata F., Kawasaki N., Ito Y., Funakami Y., Okamoto N., Shimomura Y. Hypercalcemia Leads to Delayed Corneal Wound Healing in Ovariectomized Rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2015;38:1063–1069. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b15-00227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nagai N., Yoshioka C., Tanino T., Ito Y., Okamoto N., Shimomura Y. Decrease in Corneal Damage due to Benzalkonium Chloride by the Addition of Mannitol into Timolol Maleate Eye Drops. J. Oleo. Sci. 2015;64:743–750. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess14275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Terada S., Nishimura T., Sasaki M., Yamada H., Miki M. Sericin, a protein derived from silkworms, accelerates the proliferation of several mammalian cell lines including a hybridoma. Cytotechnology. 2002;40:3–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1023993400608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yamamoto N., Majima K., Marunouchi T. A study of the proliferating activity in lens epithelium and the identification of tissue-type stem cells. Med. Mol. Morphol. 2008;41:83–91. doi: 10.1007/s00795-008-0395-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Deguchi S., Otake H., Nakazawa Y., Hiramatsu N., Yamamoto N., Nagai N. Ophthalmic Formulation Containing Nilvadipine Nanoparticles Prevents Retinal Dysfunction in Rats Injected with Streptozotocin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2720. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (141.2KB, zip)

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES