Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;53(6):e232–e238. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001063

Table 3.

Imaging Study Findings in Children with ARP or CP by PD Status

Pancreas
Divisum=Yes
(n=52)
Pancreas
Divisum=No
(n=307)
p-value

Imaging studies performed
   ERCP 37 (71%) 158 (51%) <0.01
     Number ERCP (range) (1–12) (1–9)
  1 21 88
  2 7 36
  3 5 14
   ≥4 4 20
   CT scan 27 (52%) 150 (49%) 0.68
   MRI 35 (67%) 226 (74%) 0.34
   EUS 9 (17%) 39 (13%) 0.36

Findings (any imaging)
  Focal Acute Pancreatitis 5/36 (14%) 33/240 (14%) 1.0
  Inflammatory changes 14/36 (39%) 84/242 (35%) 0.62
  Enlarged Pancreas 7/36 (19%) 55/242 (23%) 0.65
  Cysts/Pseudocysts 10/52 (19%) 49/307 (16%) 0.55
  Peripancreatic inflammation/fat stranding 16/39 (41%) 82/246 (33%) 0.34
  Gallstones/Sludge 3/36 (8%) 16/241 (7%) 0.72
  Pancreatic Atrophy 11/37 (30%) 70/245 (29%) 0.88
  PD stricture 15/49 (31%) 70/295 (24%) 0.30
  PD irregularities 20/36 (56%) 97/245 (40%) 0.07
  PD dilatation 21/36 (58%) 101/246 (41%) 0.05
  Calcifications 4/37 (11%) 24/243 (10%) 0.77
  CBD stricture 2/51 (4%) 18/305 (6%) 0.75
  CBD dilatation 8/52(15%) 58/306 (19%) 0.53
  CBD stones 1/52 (2%) 25/307 (8%) 0.14
  Intraheptic biliary dilatation 4/36 (11%) 27/245 (11%) 1.0
  Abnormal Side Branches 18/50 (36%) 80/296 (27%) 0.19
  Changes suggestive of cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension 2/36 (6%) 13/241 (5%) 1.0
  Main Pancreatic Duct - Abnormal 33/52 (63%) 160/303 (53%) 0.15
  Intraductal filling defects of calculi 9/52 (17%) 57/300 (19%) 0.77

ARP: Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis; CP: Chronic Pancreatitis; PD, pancreas divisum; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; CBD, common bile duct

Significant p values are highlighted