Table 3.
Type | Catalyst | Optimum condition | Conc (%) Yd (%) | Description | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Homogenous | PTSA | MRaGl/Fb = 1:1T = 80°C, t = 9 h | YAcetal = 80 | – | Ruiz et al., 2010 | |
PTSA | MR Gl/Ace = 1:4t = 12 h | Con = 82 | – | Suriyapradilok and Kitiyanan, 2011 | ||
PTSA | MR Gl/Benf = 1:2T = 140°C, t = 15 min | Con = 67 | Microwave assisted, Power = 600 W; Con = 95% without catalyst | Pawar et al., 2014 | ||
H2SO4 | MR Gl/F = 1.5/1T = 100°C, t = 4 h | YAcetal = 89 | – | Coleman and Blankenship, 2010 | ||
Heterogeneous | Zeolites | Zeolite beta | MR Gl/F = 1/1 T = 100°C, t = 2 h | YAcetal = 25 | – | Ruiz et al., 2010 |
Zeolite beta | MR Gl/Ac = 1/2 T = 70°C, t = 1 h | Con = 90 | – | da Silva and Mota, 2011 | ||
H beta zeolite | MR Gl/Ac = 1/2 T = 25°C, t = 2 h | Con = 86 | – | Manjunathan et al., 2015 | ||
Zeolite USY | MR Gl/Bug = 1/2.5 T = 70°C, t = 4 h | Con = 72 | – | Serafim et al., 2011 | ||
Zeolite BEA | Con = 87 | |||||
Zeolite ZSM | Con = 28 | |||||
MMT K10 | MR Gl/Ben = 1/2 T = 140°C, t = 15 min | Con = 84 | Microwave assisted, Power = 600 W | Roldan et al., 2009 | ||
Con = 95 | No catalyst | |||||
Nb5-HUSY | MR Gl/Ac = T = 40°C, Cat = 2 wt% | Con = 66SSolketal = 98 | – | Ferreira et al., 2018 | ||
MK-10SMW | T = 40°C, t = 2 h, Cat = 5 wt%, MR Gl/F = 1/1 | Con = 68SSolketal = 66 | Microwave synthesis enhanced reaction conversion | Gutiérrez-Acebo et al., 2018 | ||
[5%V]Si-ITQ-6 | T = 60°C, t = 120 min, Ac/Gl = 3/1, Cat = 0.02 g | Con = 100SSolketal = >95 | Acetone washing could reduce the catalyst deactivation after each run | Vieira et al., 2018 | ||
Zr-MO-KIT-6 | T = 50°C, t = 4 h, Ac/Gl = 8/1, Cat = 0.05 g | Con = 85.8SSolketal = 97.8 | – | Li et al., 2018a | ||
Immobilize sulfonic acid on to silica | T = 120°C, t = 8 h | Con = 78 | Argon atmosphere in the presence of Benzaldehyde | Adam et al., 2012 | ||
Zeolite betaCP814E | MR Gl/Ac = 1/6 T = 35°C, t = 4 h | Con = 82% | – | Maksimov et al., 2011 | ||
Zeolite betaCP811T1 | Con = 85% | |||||
Zeolite HY | Con = 37% | |||||
Heterogeneous | Zeolites | Hierarchical Zeolite (H/BEA5) | T = 70°C, t = 240 min, MR G/F = 1/1.25, Cat = 10% | Con = 78SSolketal = 85 | – | Sonar et al., 2018 |
6.8v-MCM-41 | T = 60 °C, t = 60 min, Ac/Gl = 6.5, Cat = 20 mg | Con = 92SSolketal = 95 | – | Abreu et al., 2018 | ||
ITQ-2 | T = 83°C, HMF/Gl = 1/2, Cat = 20 wt%, Si/Al = 15 | Con = 98S5R+6R = 100 | Products ratio 5R/6R = 2.8 | Arias et al., 2018 | ||
MCM-41 | Con = 99S5R+6R = 100 | Products ratio 5R/6R = 3.9 | ||||
Heteropoly acid | Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40 | T = 25°C, MR Gl/Ac = 1/6, Cat = 0.25 g/batch, t = 15 min | Con = 95SSolketal = 98 | – | Chen et al., 2018a | |
Cs2.5/KIT-6 | T = 70°C, MR Gl/F = 1/1.2, Cs = 3.83 g/batch, t = 24 h | Con = 95YGF = 60 | – | Chen et al., 2018b | ||
Acid exchange resins | Nafion SAC 13 | MR Gl/Ben = 1/2 T = 140°C, t = 15 min | Con = 81 | Microwave assisted, Power = 600 W, Con = 95% without catalyst | Trifoi et al., 2016 | |
Dowex | MR Gl/Bu = 1/2.5 T = 70°C, t = 4 h | Con = 66 | – | Serafim et al., 2011 | ||
Amberlyst 36 | MR Gl/F = 1/1, T = 100°C, t = 4 h | Y = 55 | – | Ruiz et al., 2010 | ||
Amberlyst 15 | MR Gl/Ac = 1/2 T = 70°C, t = 1 h | Con = 95 | – | |||
Amberlyst 15 | MR Gl/Ac = 1/2 T = 50°C, P = 8.0 bar t = 6 h | Con = 95 | – | |||
Amberlyst 47 | MR Gl/F = 2/1 T = 80–100°C, t = 3 h | Con = 75 | – | Agirre et al., 2011 | ||
Amberlyst 47 | MR Gl/Ac = 2/1 t = 10–50°C, t = 4 h | Con = 90 | ||||
Amberlyst 47 | MR Gl/Buth = 3/1 T = 80°C, t = 100 min | Con = 95 | – | Guemez et al., 2013 | ||
MR Gl/But = 0.5/1 T = 60 °C, t = 4 h | Con = 100 | |||||
Amberlyst 15 | MR Gl/F = 1/2 T = 75°C, t = 2 h | Con = 100% | Reactive distillation process | Hasabnis and Mahajani, 2014 | ||
Heterogeneous | Metal-based | Ni-activated carbon | MR Gl/Ac = 1/8 T = 45°C, t = 3 h | Con = 98 | 3% reduction of catalytic activity after the 4th run | Khayoon and Hameed, 2013 |
Zr-activated carbon | Con = 67 | |||||
X%Ni-Y%Zr/ activated carbon | Con = 100 | |||||
Ni-MWCNT i | MR Gl/Ac = 1/6 T = 40°C, t = 3 h | Con = 96 | 5% reduction of catalytic activity after 4th run | Khayoon et al., 2014 | ||
Pt-TNT | T = 50°C, t = 24 h, Ac/Gl = 1/1, Cat = 130 mg | Con = 46.7SSolketal = 10 | – | Gomes et al., 2018 | ||
M-AlPO4M-ZnAlPO4M-CuAlPO4M-NiAlPO4M-CoAlPO4 | MR Gl/Ac = 1/8 T = 80°C, t = 1 h | Con = 75 | 80% reduction of M-NiAlPO4 activity after the 5th run | Zhang et al., 2015 | ||
PTNT | T = 50 °C, MR G/Ac = 1/1, t = 6 h | Con = 40SSoketal = 20 | – | Gomes et al., 2018 | ||
SO4/SnO2 | Gl-Furj | Con = 99 | – | Mallesham et al., 2014 | ||
TiO2-SiO2 | MR Gl/Ac = 1/4 T = 40–90°C, t = 3 h | Con = 98 | = 95% | Fan et al., 2012 | ||
MoX/TiO2-ZrO2 | MR Gl/Ben = 1/1 T = 60–100°C, t = 90 min | Con = 74 | – | Sudarsanam et al., 2013 | ||
Niobium oxyhydroxyde | MR Gl/Ac = 1/4 T = 40°C, t = 1 h | Con = 74 | – | Souza et al., 2014, 2015 | ||
Nb2O5 | MR Gl/Ac = 1/3 T = 70 °C, t = 6 h | Con = 80 | Up to 4 time reusability | Nair et al., 2012 | ||
HC-SZ (/ZrO2 coated on cordierite honeycomb monolith) | T = 60°C, MR G/Ac = 1/3, Cat = 0.2 g | Con = 96, YSolketal = 94 | – | Vasantha et al., 2018 | ||
Meso-SnO2-350 | T = 60°C, t = 30 min, Ac/Gl = 1/1, Cat = 0.125 g | Con = 51.3SSolketal = 98 | Higher selectivity to the solketal in the presence of Acetone compared to the Furfuraldehyde and benzaldehyde | Manjunathan et al., 2018 | ||
Heterogeneous | Other catalysts | Rare earth triflate | Gl-Ac T = 25 °C | Con = 100 | – | Pierpont et al., 2015 |
Organic-inorganic hybrid catalyst | MR Gl/Ac = 1/6 T = 30°C, t = 3 h | Con = 94 | Water resistance | Sandesh et al., 2015 | ||
(L)Ru(II)@SBA-15 | T = 25°C, t = 20 min, MR Al/MeOH = 1/250 | Con = 100SSolketal = 100 | – | Lazar et al., 2018 | ||
80LS20PS450H+ | T = 40°C, Cat = 5 wt%, MR G/Ac = 1/6, t = 60 min | Con = 90 | SSoketal = 51–53% obtained over Furfural and Methyl levulinate instead of acetone | Konwar et al., 2017 | ||
PrSO3H-SBA-15-400 | T = 90°C, t = 8 h, F/Gl = 1.5/1, Cat = 0.2 g | SSolektal = 60 | – | Li et al., 2018b | ||
Carbon-based catalyst | T = 28°C, t = 30 min, Ac/Gl = 4/1, Cat = 3 wt% | Con = >78SSolketal = 73 | – | Mantovani et al., 2018 | ||
Co(II)!!!!(Co(III)1.25)Al2−0.75)O4 | T = 130°C, t = 3 h, 2 g Gl and 12.72 g AC, Cat = 0.1 g | Con = 69.2SSolketal = 98.6 | – | Li et al., 2018c | ||
Purolite PD206 | T = 40.66°C, P = 42.31 bar, MR Gl/Ac = 1/4.97, Feed flow rate = 0.49 ml/min, Cat = 0.5 g | Normalized exergy destraction = 6.18%, Universal Exergetic efficiency = 90.36% | Optimization and modeling of continuous acetalization process with subcritical acetone | Aghbashloa et al., 2018 | ||
KU-2 | MR Gl/Ac = 1/6 T = 60°C, t = 4 h | Con = 85% | – | Maksimov et al., 2011 | ||
Purolite PD 206 | MR Gl/Ac = 5/1 T = 20°C, P = 120 bar | Con = 95% | Acetone-solvent | Shirani et al., 2014 |
MR, Molar Ratio;
F, Formaldehyde;
Con, Conversion (%);
Y, Yield (%);
Ac, Acetone;
Ben, Benzaldehyde;
Bu, Butanal;
But, Butiraldehyde;
MWCNTs, Multiwall carbon nano-tubes;
Fur, Furfural;
kSel, Selectivity.