. 2018 Dec 3;18(6):11. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iey076

Table 3.

Hypothesis testing: results of the SH and AU tests, with rejection at P < 0.05

Hypothesis tested	PCG			PCG_AA			PCGDegen			PCGDegenRNA			PCGRNA
	Log-likelihood	P values for		Log-likelihood	P values for		Log-likelihood	P values for		Log-likelihood	P values for		Log-likelihood	P values for
	Log-likelihood	SH	AU	Log-likelihood	SH	AU	Log-likelihood	SH	AU	Log-likelihood	SH	AU	Log-likelihood	SH	AU
Coprophagous + Phytophagous	−163937.18	0.433	0.274	−66075.52	0.907	0.731	−54370.01	0.783	0.459	−74014.86	0.836	0.358	−194662.25	0.743	0.427
Sericinae + all other phytophagous	−163907.95	0.915	0.786	−66085.88	0.476	0.285	−54365.57	0.721	0.611	−74014.86	0.865	0.423	−194656.99	0.979	0.796
Melolonthinae as a nonmonophyletic group	−163988.42	0.040	0.010	−66098.73	0.187	0.138	−54389.19	0.181	0.040	−74033.71	0.095	0.023	−194664.16	0.658	0.468
Melolonthinae as a monophyletic group	−163968.76	0.112	0.027	−66098.73	0.187	0.138	−54393.38	0.156	0.038	−74033.71	0.095	0.024	−194668.23	0.578	0.179
Cetoniinae + (monophyletic Rutelinae + Dynastinae)	−163926.75	0.601	0.349	−66075.52	0.909	0.725	−54371.56	0.632	0.412	−74018.96	0.475	0.353	−194680.67	0.292	0.065
Cetoniinae + (paraphyletic Rutelinae + Dynastinae)	−163995.82	0.031	0.010	−66087.21	0.378	0.132	−54370.01	0.783	0.502	−74014.86	0.948	0.758	−194675.53	0.395	0.254